Correspondence and Brief Communications |

No Nonagenarians Please!

Erik Buskens, MD, PhD
Arch Surg. 2006;141(1):104. doi:10.1001/archsurg.141.1.104-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


I read with interest the article by Durward et al1 on the technically successful carotid endarterectomy procedures that they performed on the elderly. No doubt the group has considerable experience given the fact that they have operated on many patients, several of whom were over the age of 89. Based on their still limited experience in this specific subgroup, the authors claim that an operation should be considered for symptomatic patients in good clinical condition. It appears that this conclusion may need some tempering. In the accompanying critique, Mayer2 states that many surgeons may remain reluctant because of the high likelihood of comorbid conditions being present and also notes that one can only do so much with scarce health care resources. A simple cost-effectiveness analysis will show that because of the quite limited life expectancy, very little health may be gained in this subcategory of patients, whereas expenditures will be considerable. It is given that some strokes may be prevented, but what is actually gained by the operation? Any medical doctor should realize that this type of research is already unethical to begin with. It is a waste of valuable resources and patients are exposed to considerable risk and stand to gain nothing. This may be a rare example of the opposite of the frequently heard argument that a randomized clinical trial is unethical because too many subjects might be subjected to a supposedly inferior old treatment. I ask that readers please forget about this article and not waste future resources on the research question posed, or expose patients to unacceptable risk.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles