We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Significance of the Depth of Portal Vein Wall Invasion After Curative Resection for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma—Invited Critique

Thomas J. Howard, MD
Arch Surg. 2007;142(2):180. doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.2.180.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


This study is a careful analysis of a superb clinical experience combining PV resection with pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent operation with curative intent. I make this distinction, rather than using curative resection, because resection of pancreatic cancer, even under ideal circumstances (small tumor, no involved lymph nodes, negative margins, and minimal blood loss), is a palliative exercise. Effective, durable, hope-restoring, often long-term, but palliative nonetheless. We as surgeons want desperately to believe that our knowledge, technical skills, temerity, intuition, and experience can somehow be leveraged against overwhelming odds to achieve the purity of a surgical cure. The corollary, of course, is that anything less is viewed as a therapeutic failure—a concept that I am unwilling to accept. Rather, I choose to view these data as further confirmation of the surgeon's central role in the effective treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. The authors have done things right, achieving an overall 87.7% (121/138) margin-negative resection rate, a 36.4% (44/121) morbidity rate, and a 2.5% (3/121) mortality rate, with no significant differences between patients who required PV resection and those who did not. Their survival data are consistent with what we have come to expect, with poor survival in patients with deep venous wall invasion (overall 1-year survival of 21.5%) or positive surgical margins (overall 1-year survival of 34.4%). Unfortunately, preoperative prediction of deep venous invasion (tumor >45 mm or Nakao type C or type D on a portogram) or a positive retroperitoneal margin remains an inexact science, frequently requiring resection before the truth is accurately known. Cure of pancreatic cancer requires more than we currently have available. This glaring deficiency should not color the achievements of Fukuda and colleagues in providing effective surgical palliation with a low morbidity and mortality rate in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles