The last few years have been the most challenging period for the Residency Review Committee for Surgery (RRC-S) since its inception in 1950. As the first residency review committee to be established, the committee has a laudable history of contemplative deliberations before implementing any directive from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). For example, debate still surrounds the process for implementing the requirements for the 6 general competencies (patient care, medical knowledge, interpersonal/communication skills, professionalism, practice-based learning/improvement, and system-based practice). However, the ACGME has been unwavering in its advocacy of the competency template as the cornerstone of the learning continuum and outcome assessment. The 6 general competencies can actually be grouped into 3 basic categories: fund of knowledge, skills, and judgment. As highlighted in Table 1, these categories are essentially the same as what Aristotle espoused centuries ago. Nevertheless, pundits in the surgery arena continue to denounce the general competencies as superfluous and “unfunded mandates.” Such criticism has not derailed the process of incorporating these competencies into the curriculum. What appears to have broader support in the “house of surgery” is what is being labeled as the “seventh competency”—procedure-based competency (Table 2).
Current accreditation outline.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Surgery editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 5
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.