We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Excision Margins for Primary Cutaneous Melanoma—Invited Critique

Charles M. Balch, MD; Merrick I. Ross, MD; Natale Cascinelli, MD; Seng-jaw Soong, PhD
Arch Surg. 2007;142(9):891-893. doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.9.891.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Collectively, surgeons have incorporated evidence-based practices increasingly over the last decades. The meta-analysis on 5 clinical trials involving melanoma surgical excision margins by Lens et al in this issue of the Archives provides an opportunity to review the evolution of our current standard of care for melanoma surgery and exemplifies a continuing shift from empirically based to evidence-based surgery.

Readers of the Archives might recall that just 25 years ago the standard of care was to excise melanomas with 4-cm to 5-cm radial margins of skin (Yes, that would be 5 to 6 inches across!), with disfiguring, morbid closures and large skin grafts. Historically, the approach of using radical margins has been ascribed to the anecdotal experience of Handley,1 who in 1907 reported his treatment of locally advanced melanomas and his finding of “centripetal lymphatic spread” of disease. Sustaining this practice of wide excision was the known association of local recurrence with a high risk of distant metastases and fear that undertreatment of the primary melanoma with a narrow excision might contribute to increased risk of local recurrence and patient death. Almost 70 years later, a Commission on Cancer national survey on the treatment of melanoma in the United States showed that most patients underwent radical excision of primary melanomas.2 Furthermore, there was no clear correlation of the excision margin selected with either tumor thickness or level of invasion2 despite published reports that local recurrence rates are low in thinner, nonulcerated melanomas.3 The radical excision standard was the same elsewhere in the world. In 1988, Veronesi and colleagues wrote that “For decades, wide excision (with margins of 3 to 5 cm) has been universally accepted as the treatment of choice . . . the belief has been so strong that among more than 800 patients in the WHO Melanoma Registry, we found only 40 who had been treated with a margin of less than 2 cm.”4(p1159) During these middle decades of the 20th century, the natural history of melanoma was profoundly changing. The incidence of melanoma was increasing dramatically, but most of these melanomas were both thinner and more superficially invasive and were associated with a low risk of local recurrence.5

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Odds Ratios in Case-Control Studies of Patient Exposures