We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Comparison of P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM Scores in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Resection—Invited Critique

James W. Fleshman Jr, MD
Arch Surg. 2007;142(11):1048. doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.11.1048.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Assessment of outcomes for surgical services may become an important way for the government and insurance companies to grade health systems, hospitals, and individual practitioners. Any time outcomes are evaluated or compared, a method of assessing the influence of medical comorbidity on the selected outcome of a selected procedure for a selected disease must be provided to make the evaluation meaningful. POSSUM, P-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM scores are methods for assessing the severity of comorbid and operative factors that might influence surgical outcomes using complicated formulas associating numerous data points that include medical comorbidity and operative severity factors. Senagore and colleagues1 showed that the 3 POSSUM scores need to be calibrated by each system and suggest that comparison between 2 systems should be undertaken carefully. The Cr-POSSUM score predicts mortality closely even though missing data from the medical records of patients causes little variation in the ability to predict outcome for colon cancer. This suggests that the score for an individual patient may not be reliable. Therefore, we must be careful when using the scores to predict individual patient outcomes, influence selection of a complicated procedure, and determine futility of operative management of advanced disease on the basis of individual POSSUM scores. In the article by Horzic et al this point is emphasized by calculating the AUC. The value of 0.59 for Cr-POSSUM indicates almost random prediction of mortality for an individual patient, even though it is an accurate predictor for a population of patients with colorectal cancer. It is unlikely that the Cr-POSSUM score will ever be calculated for use in an individual patient as part of the decision making preoperative process.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis