Correspondence and Brief Communications |

Prosthetic Hiatal Closure During Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication—Reply

Frank A. Granderath, MD; Rudolph Pointner, MD
Arch Surg. 2007;142(11):1111. doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.11.1111-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

We appreciate the interest of Dr Csendes in our article and thank him for his comments. As well as in previous studies, the key aspect of this article was to focus on the effect of the use of a prosthetic mesh for hiatal closure during laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS). Recent publications could prove the beneficial effect of a hiatal mesh application regarding the postoperative hiatal hernia recurrence with or without intrathoracic migration of the fundic wrap.1,2 However, there is still discussion about the size or shape of these meshes. In our mind, the reason for using a small mesh is to ensure a sufficient closure of the hiatal crura on the one hand and minimize the risk for esophageal erosion or mesh migration on the other hand. In our own experience with a prospective randomized trial comparing patients who underwent LARS with and without hiatal mesh prosthesis, we found out that even the application of a small 1 × 3-cm polypropylene mesh for posterior mesh cruroplasty results in a significantly lower rate of postoperative intrathoracic wrap migration. In spite of these results, we found a significantly higher rate of short-term dysphagia in the patients who underwent prosthetic hiatal closure.3 As a result, the main purpose of this current study was to clarify the morphological cause of this higher dysphagia rate and particularly answer the question whether there is a correlation between mesh-related dysphagia and esophageal body motility and/or lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles