0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Article |

Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Benign Disease FREE

Francesco Ardito, MD; Claude Tayar, MD; Alexis Laurent, MD, PhD; Mehdi Karoui, MD, PhD; Jerome Loriau, MD; Daniel Cherqui, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique[[ndash]]H[[ocirc]]pitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Henri Mondor Hospital, Cr[[eacute]]teil, France.


Arch Surg. 2007;142(12):1188-1193. doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.12.1188.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Hypothesis  Resection for benign liver disease can represent a valid indication for the laparoscopic approach.

Design  Prospective case series.

Setting  Tertiary referral center.

Patients  Fifty patients with benign disease underwent laparoscopic liver resection. Indications for resection included preoperative diagnosis of adenoma or cystadenoma, uncertain preoperative diagnosis, and presence of symptoms. Inclusion criteria were lesions 5 cm or less located in the peripheral segments (segments 2-6).

Intervention  Laparoscopic liver resection using a surgical technique including 5 ports, harmonic transection, stapling of large vessels, and extraction in a bag through a separate incision.

Main Outcome Measures  Intraoperative results and postoperative morbidity.

Results  Thirty-five patients (70%) presented with solid tumor; 11 (22%), with cystic lesions; and 4 (8%), with biliary disease. Tumor was solitary in 41 cases (82%) and multiple in 9 (18%). Mean (SD) surgical time was 191 (77.5) minutes (range, 30-480 minutes). There were 4 conversions (8%) and 1 patient received a transfusion (2%). There was no mortality. The postoperative morbidity rate was 10% and included only nonspecific complications. Median hospital stay was 5 days.

Conclusions  Laparoscopic liver resection for benign disease can be recommended in patients with peripheral lesions requiring limited resection. Major resections may be performed in highly select patients but require further evaluation. Specific training is required. Indications for laparoscopic resection of benign liver disease must be the same as those for open surgery. Reduction of abdominal wall damage and cosmetic advantages of the laparoscopic approach represent a clear benefit in patients with benign liver disease.

Figures in this Article

Most indications for liver resections include malignant disease. However, about 15% of hepatectomies are performed for benign liver tumors.1,2 Laparoscopic liver resection was first reported in 1992,3 but unlike other areas of abdominal surgery, this approach has been developed in a very limited number of institutions.410 Except for a few studies, most of the articles reported a limited number of patients, but it has been established that in select patients, laparoscopic liver resections, if performed in institutions with expertise in hepatic surgery and advanced laparoscopic procedures, are safe, with results identical to those of open surgery.59,11,12 Resection for benign liver disease can represent a valid indication for the laparoscopic approach because of the absence of risk of tumoral dissemination. Furthermore, most of these patients are young and undergoing definitive surgery where the advantages and benefits of the laparoscopic procedure can be particularly clear.9 Indications for benign liver tumor resection include preoperative diagnosis of adenoma or cystadenoma, uncertain preoperative diagnosis, and presence of symptoms.1317 The aim of our study was to report the results of laparoscopic liver resections for benign disease performed at a single center with 10 years of experience in laparoscopic liver surgery.

In January 1996, a prospective evaluation of laparoscopic liver resections was initiated.9 Between May 1996 and September 2005, 514 liver resections were performed in our unit and a laparoscopic approach was used in 120 (23.3%). Indications for surgery for the 514 hepatectomies were malignant disease in 420 cases (81.7%) and benign disease in 94 (18.3%). Laparoscopic liver resections were performed in 50 of the 94 patients (53.2%) with benign liver disease and they are the subject of this study.

Indications for laparoscopic resection of benign liver tumors were not different from those for the open approach: preoperative diagnosis of adenoma and cystadenoma, uncertain diagnosis on imaging or biopsy, and presence of symptoms. The laparoscopic approach was chosen with regard to the size and location of the lesion. Size of the lesions was 5 cm or less in diameter, except for pedunculated lesions, which could be larger. Only lesions that were located in the left or peripheral right segments of the liver (Couinaud segments 2-6) were included. Large tumors, tumors close to the major vascular structures, and those located in the posterior or central segments were excluded. Exclusion criteria for the laparoscopic approach are shown in Table 1.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Exclusion Criteria for the Laparoscopic Approach

Liver resections were defined according to International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association terminology derived from the Couinaud classification.18 Resection of 3 or more segments was classified as major hepatectomy.

The surgical technique for laparoscopic liver resection used in our unit has been previously described.9 Briefly, the procedures were performed with pressure-controlled carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, maintained lower than 12 mm Hg. In all cases, a 30° laparoscope and 5 trocars were used (Figure). Liver transection was performed using a harmonic scalpel (Ultracision; Ethicon Endo-surgery, Issy-Les-Moulineaux, France) and ultrasonic dissector (Dissectron; Satelec, Merignac, France). Small vascular or biliary pedicles were divided after bipolar coagulation or between clips. Portal pedicles and major hepatic veins were divided using a linear stapler (EndoGIA, Tyco, Paris, France). The portal pedicle was systematically encircled with tape to allow intermittent clamping (15-minute clamping and 5-minute release periods) if required. The resected specimen was moved into a plastic bag through a Pfannenstiel incision or through a previous appendectomy incision. Abdominal drainage was usually omitted. More recently, the hand-assisted procedure was used for right hepatectomy, using a gas-tight device (Lap Disc; Ethicon Endo-surgery) inserted through an 8-cm, right, lower quadrant incision. The 10- and 12-mm port sites were closed using absorbable suture material. Recently, we have used noncutting trocars not requiring closure.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.

Typical 5-port placement for laparoscopic liver resection. The patient is in the supine position with lower limbs apart, the surgeon between the legs. The specimen is extracted through a suprapubic incision or a previous appendectomy incision.

Graphic Jump Location

Characteristics of the 50 patients are summarized in Table 2. The mean age of the patients was 44 years (range, 15-79 years). Twelve patients (24%) were younger than 35 years and 84% (42) of the patients were female.

The tumor was solitary in 41 cases (82%), while 3 patients (6%) presented with 2 nodules. In the other 6 patients (12%), there were multiple tumors. The lesions were located as follows: 18 in the right liver, 30 in the left liver, and 2 in both lobes. The lesion was located in a posterior segment (segment 7) in 1 patient. The lesion was hepatocellular adenoma and the patient underwent laparoscopic right hepatectomy by hand-assisted procedure. Mean (SD) tumor size measured on the surgical specimen was 50 (27) mm (range, 18-120 mm) (Table 2).

Preoperative radiological investigations included ultrasonography in all 50 patients, computed tomography in 41 patients (82%), and magnetic resonance imaging in 32 patients (64%). Thirty-five patients (70%) had solid liver tumor, 11 patients (22%) presented with cystic lesions, 3 patients (6%) had Caroli disease, and 1 patient (2%) had intrahepatic lithiasis. Eleven of the 35 patients (31.4%) with solid liver tumor underwent a tumor biopsy (percutaneously in 4 cases, laparoscopically before starting liver resection in 6 cases, percutaneously and laparoscopically in 1 case). In this series, tumor biopsy allowed us to obtain a certain diagnosis in 4 cases (36.4%; 4 of 11 tumor biopsies).

INDICATIONS

Presence of symptoms and a preoperative uncertain diagnosis were the 2 most common indications (Table 3). Among benign solid tumors, preoperative typical features of hepatic adenoma were found in 4 patients. Three of these patients presented with incidental asymptomatic hepatic lesions and 1 had polyadenomatosis disease. Histologic examination confirmed the preoperative diagnosis in all of these patients. Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) was diagnosed preoperatively and confirmed after liver resection in 7 cases. The indication for liver resection in these patients was presence of symptoms related to the mass (right upper quadrant pain in 4 cases; palpable mass, discomfort, and early satiety in 3 cases). In 18 patients, imaging characteristics and biopsy features did not exclude hepatocellular adenoma and they underwent liver resection with diagnostic intent. Of these 18 patients, histologic diagnosis after resection confirmed hepatocellular adenoma in 3 patients. The diagnosis in the other 15 patients was FNH.

Two patients with polycystic disease had food intolerance and pain as a result of a cystic disease predominant in the left lobe. Cystadenoma was suspected in 4 patients with symptomatic cystic lesions located on left lateral segments. Symptoms were early satiety and discomfort due to increasing size of lesions. Histologic diagnosis after resection confirmed cystadenoma in 1 patient. Patients with hydatid cysts (5 cases) and hemangioma (2 cases) had right upper quadrant pain. Three patients with localized Caroli disease and 1 patient with intrahepatic lithiasis had recurrent cholangitis and cholestasis (Table 3).

SURGICAL RESULTS

The laparoscopic procedure was completed in 46 patients. Of these 46 patients, 2 underwent a hand-assisted procedure. In 4 patients (8%), the operation was converted to laparotomy. Conversion was required in the patient with polyadenomatosis disease, who had about 20 nodules in the right liver and 1 nodule in segment 4. Cause of conversion in this case was doubt on tumor limits. This patient underwent right hepatectomy extended to segment 4. Conversion to control bleeding occurred in 3 patients (75% of conversions). At the beginning of our experience, 2 of these patients were converted to laparotomy for mild hemorrhage in the area of the left hepatic vein during left hepatectomy and bisegmentectomy of segments 2 and 3, respectively. In these 2 cases, a short midline incision was made, permitting safe completion of the resection. The third patient was converted because of hemorrhage from the middle hepatic vein during right hepatectomy.

Types and details of the liver resections are shown in Table 4 and Table 5. They included 8 major hepatectomies. The patient who underwent right hepatectomy and who was converted to laparotomy because of bleeding from the middle hepatic vein required intraoperative blood transfusions (3 U) (Table 5). No clinically significant gas embolism occurred.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 4. Types of Liver Resections Performed

Mean surgical time was 191 minutes. During the first 5 years of experience in our unit (1996-2000), mean surgical time was not significantly different from that of the second 5-year period (2001-2005): 188 minutes (median, 180 minutes; range, 30-360 minutes) vs 191 minutes (median, 180 minutes; range, 70-480 minutes). However, most major hepatectomies (75%) were performed during the second 5-year period. Mean (SD) duration of surgery for minor resection during the first period was 180 (66) minutes (median, 178 minutes; range, 30-330 minutes) and during the second period, 150 (66) minutes (median, 155 minutes; range, 70-240 minutes). The difference was statistically significant (P < .05).

POSTOPERATIVE RESULTS

There was no mortality in this series. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (10%) (Table 6). Pulmonary complications occurred in 2 patients: 1 patient developed infectious pneumonia and the other patient, who had conversion to laparotomy, developed pleural effusion that required placement of chest tube. One patient developed cardiac arrhythmia. Two incisional hernias occurred on 12-mm port orifices requiring secondary reoperation.

The mean follow-up in this series was 55 months (median, 59 months; range, 3-115 months). All symptomatic patients had complete symptom relief. One patient who underwent bisegmentectomy of segments 2 and 3 for polycystic disease had recurrent symptoms at 3 years due to further progression of cysts located in the right lobe. She underwent laparoscopic cyst fenestration with good functional result. Interestingly, there were minimal adhesions at repeat laparoscopy, which was very smooth.

To our knowledge, this study represents the largest series of laparoscopic liver resections for benign disease performed in a single unit.7,10,12,20,21 The advantages of laparoscopic liver resections are those of all laparoscopic procedures. The reduction of the abdominal wall damage is associated with decreased postoperative pain, reduced peritoneal adhesions, shorter hospital stay, and an earlier return to previous activity.5,6,2226 Furthermore, 2 case-control studies have shown that, despite longer operating times, the laparoscopic procedure is associated with reduced blood loss and reduced morbidity.27,28 Also, there are cosmetic advantages of the smaller incisions used in the laparoscopic approach.9,22 For these reasons, the laparoscopic approach should be taken into account, especially in benign liver disease management.

Use of the laparoscopic approach should not modify or widen indications for liver resections, especially in cases of benign liver disease. Biliary cysts and hemangiomas are easily diagnosed and they do not require resection except in rare cases of symptomatic or doubtful lesions.9 In this series, 3 liver resections were performed for biliary cysts because they were symptomatic cystic lesions with suspicion of cystadenoma on imaging and 2 liver resections were performed for hemangiomas because of presence of symptoms. Our policy in cases of benign hepatocellular tumors includes resection of hepatic adenomas and conservative treatment of FNH when the diagnosis is certain.9,17 Use of the laparoscopic approach did not change this attitude and did not increase the number of patients with FNH who underwent liver resection. In this series, 22 patients with FNH underwent laparoscopic liver resection. Of these 22 patients, 15 underwent liver resection with diagnostic intent because of suspicion of hepatocellular adenoma and the other 7 patients presented with symptomatic lesions. These patients represent less than 10% of patients with FNH seen at our institution between May 1996 and September 2005.

This series shows the technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resections for benign disease in select patients. A learning curve effect was noted for limited resections, with a significant reduction in operative time over the 2 consecutive 5-year periods. Mortality was nil and postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (10%). Two incisional hernias occurred on 12-mm port orifices in obese patients, requiring minor secondary reoperation. The incisional hernia in the port orifice emphasizes the need for adequate fascia closure of port sites 10 mm and greater, which may be difficult in obese patients. The use of noncutting trocars may be useful. There were no specific postoperative complications, such as postoperative bleeding or bile leak. These results could underline a more precise surgical technique associated with the magnification of the laparoscopic approach. Patient recovery was excellent and most patients were discharged from the hospital in less than 1 week.

Careful selection of patients and liver tumors is essential to perform laparoscopic liver resection with safe results. Location and size of the lesion should be carefully evaluated before choosing the laparoscopic approach. As previously described, our policy is to consider the anterior and lateral segments (segments 2-6) as safe segments for laparoscopic resection.9 In our series, only 1 patient with hepatocellular adenoma located in segment 7 underwent laparoscopic liver resection. In this case, a laparoscopic, hand-assisted right hepatectomy was performed. In our study, the mean tumor size measured on the surgical specimen was 50 mm and we did not consider large lesions or lesions located near the major vascular structures or in the central and posterior segments for the laparoscopic approach (Table 2). Laparoscopy may have additional advantages in obese patients, but selection for laparoscopic liver resection was based on anticipated feasibility (size and location) and not on body mass index.

Bleeding during laparoscopic transection occurs as in open surgery but may be more difficult to control. Therefore, a very careful technique must be used and the surgeon must be able to control most bleeding episodes laparoscopically. However, bleeding was the cause of 3 of 4 conversions in this series. Two bleeding episodes were mild and occurred early in our experience and would not require conversion today. However, there was 1 episode of significant bleeding from the middle hepatic vein during right hepatectomy. This was the only patient who received transfusions in this series.

Few series reported resection of 3 or more segments.5,8,21,29 Although most resections in this series were fewer than 3 segments, 8 major hepatectomies were performed for benign disease (16%). Three of the 4 conversions occurred during major resection, for a 37% conversion rate in major resections (2 were for bleeding and 1, for doubt on tumor limits in a patient with multiple adenomas). By contrast, there was only 1 conversion among 42 minor resections at the beginning of our experience. This difference shows that, in our hands, laparoscopic limited resection for peripheral lesions has become standardized, while major hepatectomy remains challenging and requires further improvements. We have found hand assistance helpful in reducing operative time and the conversion rate in laparoscopic right hepatectomy.

According to our results, we believe that laparoscopic liver resection for benign disease can be recommended in patients with left-sided and right-peripheral lesions requiring limited resection. By contrast, laparoscopic major resections require further evaluation. Laparoscopic liver resections should be performed in units with a combined expertise in hepatic surgery and advanced laparoscopic procedures. Indications for resection of benign liver disease should not be widened by the availability of the laparoscopic approach but must be the same as those of open surgery. Reduction of abdominal wall damage and cosmetic advantages of the laparoscopic approach represent a clear benefit in patients with benign liver disease.

Correspondence: Daniel Cherqui, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, 51 avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil CEDEX, France (daniel.cherqui@hmn.ap-hop-paris.fr).

Accepted for Publication: July 7, 2006.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Cherqui. Acquisition of data: Ardito, Tayar, Laurent, Karoui, and Loriau. Analysis and interpretation of data: Ardito. Drafting of the manuscript: Ardito. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Tayar, Laurent, Karoui, Loriau, and Cherqui. Study supervision: Cherqui.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Poon  RTFan  STLo  CM  et al.  Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database. Ann Surg 2004;240 (4) 698- 710
PubMed
Jarnagin  WRGonen  MFong  Y  et al.  Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 2002;236 (4) 397- 407
PubMed Link to Article
Gagner  MRheault  MDubuc  J Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor [abstract]. Surg Endosc 1992;6 (2) 99
Kaneko  HTakagi  SShiba  T Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy: technique and results of a clinical series. Surgery 1996;120 (3) 468- 475
PubMed Link to Article
Hüscher  CGLirici  MMChiodini  S Laparoscopic liver resections. Semin Laparosc Surg 1998;5 (3) 204- 210
PubMed
Rau  HGButtler  EMeyer  GSchardey  HMSchildberg  FW Laparoscopic liver resection compared with conventional partial hepatectomy—a prospective analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45 (24) 2333- 2338
PubMed
Katkhouda  NHurwitz  MGugenheim  J  et al.  Laparoscopic management of benign solid and cystic lesions of the liver. Ann Surg 1999;229 (4) 460- 466
PubMed Link to Article
Descottes  BLachachi  FSodji  M  et al.  Early experience with laparoscopic approach for solid liver tumors: initial 16 cases. Ann Surg 2000;232 (5) 641- 645
PubMed Link to Article
Cherqui  DHusson  EHammoud  R  et al.  Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 2000;232 (6) 753- 762
PubMed Link to Article
Farges  OJagot  PKirstetter  PMarty  JBelghiti  J Prospective assessment of the safety and benefit of laparoscopic liver resections. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002;9 (2) 242- 248
PubMed Link to Article
Azagra  JSGoergen  MGilbart  EJacobs  D Laparoscopic anatomical (hepatic) left lateral segmentectomy—technical aspects. Surg Endosc 1996;10 (7) 758- 761
PubMed Link to Article
Descottes  BGlineur  DLachachi  F  et al.  Laparoscopic liver resection for benign liver tumors: results of a multicenter European experience. Surg Endosc 2003;17 (1) 23- 30
PubMed Link to Article
Kammula  USBuell  JFLabow  DMRosen  SMillis  JMPosner  MC Surgical management of benign tumors of the liver. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 2001;30 (3) 141- 146
PubMed Link to Article
Terkivatan  Tde Wilt  JHWde Man  RA  et al.  Indications and long-term outcome of treatment for benign hepatic tumors. Arch Surg 2001;136 (9) 1033- 1038
PubMed Link to Article
Weimann  ARinge  BKlempnauer  J  et al.  Benign liver tumors: differential diagnosis and indications for surgery. World J Surg 1997;21 (9) 983- 991
PubMed Link to Article
Charny  CKJarnagin  WRSchwartz  LH  et al.  Management of 155 patients with benign liver tumors. Br J Surg 2001;88 (6) 808- 813
PubMed Link to Article
Cherqui  DRahmouni  ACharlotte  F  et al.  Management of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma in young women: a series of 41 patients with clinical, radiological and pathological correlations. Hepatology 1995;22 (6) 1674- 1681
PubMed Link to Article
 IHPBA Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB Surg 2000;2 (3) 333- 339
American Society of Anesthesiologists, New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963;24 (1) 111
Morino  MMorra  IRosso  EMiglietta  CGarrone  C Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2003;17 (12) 1914- 1918
PubMed Link to Article
Vibert  EPerniceni  TLevard  HDenet  CShahri  NKGayet  B Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 2006;93 (1) 67- 72
PubMed Link to Article
Cherqui  D Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 2003;90 (6) 644- 646
PubMed Link to Article
Soper  NJBrunt  LMKerbl  K Laparoscopic general surgery. N Engl J Med 1994;330 (6) 409- 419
PubMed Link to Article
Perniceni  TSlim  K What are the validated indications for laparoscopy in digestive surgery? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2001;25 (4) ((suppl)) B57- B70
PubMed
Abbou  CCCicco  AGasman  D  et al.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol 1999;161 (6) 1776- 1780
PubMed Link to Article
Delaunay  LBonnet  FCherqui  DRimaniol  JMDahan  EAtlan  G Laparoscopic cholecystectomy minimally impairs postoperative cardiorespiratory and muscle performance. Br J Surg 1995;82 (3) 373- 376
PubMed Link to Article
Lesurtel  MCherqui  DLaurent  ATayar  CFagniez  PL Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case-control study. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196 (2) 236- 242
PubMed Link to Article
Laurent  ACherqui  DLesurtel  MBrunetti  FTayar  CFagniez  PL Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease. Arch Surg 2003;138 (7) 763- 769
PubMed Link to Article
Fong  YJarnagin  WConlon  KCDematteo  RDougherty  EBlumgart  LH Hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. Arch Surg 2000;135 (7) 854- 859
PubMed Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.

Typical 5-port placement for laparoscopic liver resection. The patient is in the supine position with lower limbs apart, the surgeon between the legs. The specimen is extracted through a suprapubic incision or a previous appendectomy incision.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Exclusion Criteria for the Laparoscopic Approach
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 4. Types of Liver Resections Performed

References

Poon  RTFan  STLo  CM  et al.  Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database. Ann Surg 2004;240 (4) 698- 710
PubMed
Jarnagin  WRGonen  MFong  Y  et al.  Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 2002;236 (4) 397- 407
PubMed Link to Article
Gagner  MRheault  MDubuc  J Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor [abstract]. Surg Endosc 1992;6 (2) 99
Kaneko  HTakagi  SShiba  T Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy: technique and results of a clinical series. Surgery 1996;120 (3) 468- 475
PubMed Link to Article
Hüscher  CGLirici  MMChiodini  S Laparoscopic liver resections. Semin Laparosc Surg 1998;5 (3) 204- 210
PubMed
Rau  HGButtler  EMeyer  GSchardey  HMSchildberg  FW Laparoscopic liver resection compared with conventional partial hepatectomy—a prospective analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45 (24) 2333- 2338
PubMed
Katkhouda  NHurwitz  MGugenheim  J  et al.  Laparoscopic management of benign solid and cystic lesions of the liver. Ann Surg 1999;229 (4) 460- 466
PubMed Link to Article
Descottes  BLachachi  FSodji  M  et al.  Early experience with laparoscopic approach for solid liver tumors: initial 16 cases. Ann Surg 2000;232 (5) 641- 645
PubMed Link to Article
Cherqui  DHusson  EHammoud  R  et al.  Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 2000;232 (6) 753- 762
PubMed Link to Article
Farges  OJagot  PKirstetter  PMarty  JBelghiti  J Prospective assessment of the safety and benefit of laparoscopic liver resections. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002;9 (2) 242- 248
PubMed Link to Article
Azagra  JSGoergen  MGilbart  EJacobs  D Laparoscopic anatomical (hepatic) left lateral segmentectomy—technical aspects. Surg Endosc 1996;10 (7) 758- 761
PubMed Link to Article
Descottes  BGlineur  DLachachi  F  et al.  Laparoscopic liver resection for benign liver tumors: results of a multicenter European experience. Surg Endosc 2003;17 (1) 23- 30
PubMed Link to Article
Kammula  USBuell  JFLabow  DMRosen  SMillis  JMPosner  MC Surgical management of benign tumors of the liver. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 2001;30 (3) 141- 146
PubMed Link to Article
Terkivatan  Tde Wilt  JHWde Man  RA  et al.  Indications and long-term outcome of treatment for benign hepatic tumors. Arch Surg 2001;136 (9) 1033- 1038
PubMed Link to Article
Weimann  ARinge  BKlempnauer  J  et al.  Benign liver tumors: differential diagnosis and indications for surgery. World J Surg 1997;21 (9) 983- 991
PubMed Link to Article
Charny  CKJarnagin  WRSchwartz  LH  et al.  Management of 155 patients with benign liver tumors. Br J Surg 2001;88 (6) 808- 813
PubMed Link to Article
Cherqui  DRahmouni  ACharlotte  F  et al.  Management of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma in young women: a series of 41 patients with clinical, radiological and pathological correlations. Hepatology 1995;22 (6) 1674- 1681
PubMed Link to Article
 IHPBA Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB Surg 2000;2 (3) 333- 339
American Society of Anesthesiologists, New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963;24 (1) 111
Morino  MMorra  IRosso  EMiglietta  CGarrone  C Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2003;17 (12) 1914- 1918
PubMed Link to Article
Vibert  EPerniceni  TLevard  HDenet  CShahri  NKGayet  B Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 2006;93 (1) 67- 72
PubMed Link to Article
Cherqui  D Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 2003;90 (6) 644- 646
PubMed Link to Article
Soper  NJBrunt  LMKerbl  K Laparoscopic general surgery. N Engl J Med 1994;330 (6) 409- 419
PubMed Link to Article
Perniceni  TSlim  K What are the validated indications for laparoscopy in digestive surgery? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2001;25 (4) ((suppl)) B57- B70
PubMed
Abbou  CCCicco  AGasman  D  et al.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol 1999;161 (6) 1776- 1780
PubMed Link to Article
Delaunay  LBonnet  FCherqui  DRimaniol  JMDahan  EAtlan  G Laparoscopic cholecystectomy minimally impairs postoperative cardiorespiratory and muscle performance. Br J Surg 1995;82 (3) 373- 376
PubMed Link to Article
Lesurtel  MCherqui  DLaurent  ATayar  CFagniez  PL Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case-control study. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196 (2) 236- 242
PubMed Link to Article
Laurent  ACherqui  DLesurtel  MBrunetti  FTayar  CFagniez  PL Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease. Arch Surg 2003;138 (7) 763- 769
PubMed Link to Article
Fong  YJarnagin  WConlon  KCDematteo  RDougherty  EBlumgart  LH Hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. Arch Surg 2000;135 (7) 854- 859
PubMed Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 36

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles