We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

B-Type Natriuretic Peptide: A Biomarker for the Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Patients With Septic Shock—Invited Critique

Eddie L. Hoover, MD
Arch Surg. 2008;143(3):246. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2007.70.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Kandil and colleagues purport a role for BNP level as a useful marker of ventricular function and mortality in sepsis. There were no demographic data provided for the groups, specifically age and the underlying disease. Also, the absence of any BNP data between days 1 and 21 precludes potential useful information about BNP activity in response to therapy. These investigators state that patients without renal and heart failure may benefit from measurement of BNP levels but do not present any supporting data, only concepts. They also state that BNP level determination may help with risk stratification, which is suspect because there was no significant difference between the control subjects and patients with early sepsis (100 ± 9.4 vs 120 ± 11.2 pg/mL). They further stated that BNP level may serve as “a valuable measure for determining reduced left ventricular function in patients with septic shock”; again, with no supporting data. Besides, there are much better tools for assessing left ventricular function (eg, thermistor-tipped, flow-directed pulmonary artery catheters and transesophageal echocardiography or even transthoracic echocardiography) because BNP level provides no quantitative data. The authors gave no information about the availability of this test in most hospitals: Is it a routine test, or a research study that must be sent to a reference laboratory? What does it cost, and will insurance companies pay for it? Elevation of BNP level in septic shock may well be just a measure of deteriorating myocardial function during end-stage sepsis after weeks of significant tachycardia and pressors, when the heart can no longer compensate. I was surprised to see a resurrection of an ancient term, myocardial depressant substance, which we used (and discarded) many years ago to explain observations we did not understand. In my view, their goal of determining a role for BNP in sepsis was not achieved, and their observations most likely represent a “true-true but unrelated” association between the two. As presented, they can say only that if BNP levels remain high, death is imminent; there is little one can do with such information except withhold treatment, which is not an option in this context.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Does This Dyspneic Patient in the Emergency Department Have Congestive Heart Failure?

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis