Invited Critique |

Management of Delayed Postoperative Hemorrhage After Pancreaticoduodenectomy—Invited Critique

Thomas J. Howard, MD
Arch Surg. 2008;143(10):1007. doi:10.1001/archsurg.143.10.1007.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Lies, damn lies, and statistics”: This famous phrase could be used to describe recent forays into evidence-based medicine, where the filtering of disparate data from small, underpowered studies using the mechanics of a meta-analysis conveys to the reader a higher degree of precision than is warranted. Take the meta-analysis of DPH after pancreaticoduodenectomy by Limongelli and colleagues published in this issue of the Archives. The authors have followed rigorous steps for identifying the relevant published literature, combining them, and applying appropriate statistical analysis using a random-effects model to examine the overall results. They performed an appropriate, well-done textbook study, even including oversight on their data collection and transfer. What this method fails to convey is that, despite this structure, it remains a composite of small numbers of patients (largest series, 22 patients), treated by a large number of heterogeneous surgeons on several continents who possessed widely disparate expertise and variable access to dissimilar levels of care. It seems inconceivable to me that a P value, no matter how rigorously derived, is capable of accurately adjusting for all of these variables and mathematically accepting one method of treatment over another. It may be time to accept the fact that there are certain disease states encountered not infrequently in biomedical science, particularly the discipline of surgery, that present insurmountable limitations when one attempts to derive a single truth for all patients. Is this the elusive art that we all recognize as a major component of our discipline? As the authors correctly conclude in their discussion, “The management of this life-threatening complication ultimately will be dictated by the clinical status of the patient and the institutional preference.” What they failed to mention is, “despite the P value assigned.”

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles