Invited Critique |

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Lymph Node Assessment in Stage II Colon Cancer—Invited Critique

Clifford Y. Ko, MD, MS, MSHS; Sushma Jain, MBBS, MPH
Arch Surg. 2008;143(11):1055-1056. doi:10.1001/archsurg.143.11.1055.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In this article, Wright et al report their findings addressing a quality of care improvement initiative in Ontario and share important discoveries that are appropriate to the current environment of health care quality evaluation. The authors are to be congratulated for their efforts in bringing this work forward. There are several things to appreciate in this study.

First, it is a collaborative effort of clinical health services researchers and the community (Ontario). This community-based participatory research effort, where researchers partner with a community to provide improved quality of care,1 is one that we hope will be performed with increasing frequency. The simple concept is to demonstrably improve care in an identified community, but importantly, working with the community such that the improvement has traction and is sustained. For many of the partnerships that have been established in this regard, a simple but powerful vision is for researchers to improve the level of quality of care beginning in their own backyard, not just in their own institution (although that may be included) but in the communities in proximity to their institution. It is a relatively new and important wave of research in surgery. It is an achievable and meaningful way to perform research, and one that Wright et al have nicely undertaken.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles