We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Effect of Laparoscopy on the Indications for Adrenalectomy—Invited Critique

Richard A. Prinz, MD; G. Scott Smith, MD
Arch Surg. 2009;144(3):259. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2008.552.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The indications for adrenalectomy were developed before the introduction of laparoscopy. Tumors larger than 5 cm, tumors between 3 and 5 cm with worrisome features or in young patients who would require prolonged follow-up, and functioning tumors are generally accepted reasons to recommend adrenalectomy. In this article, Henneman and others reviewed their 20-year experience with adrenal surgery to determine whether the indications for operation have changed with the introduction of LA at their center. They conclude that the indications for surgery have remained constant during the study period. However, the authors note a dramatic increase in the number of adrenalectomies performed, from 66 cases to 203 cases after the introduction of LA. The laparoscopic era was further divided into 5-year intervals. An increase from 81 cases in the first 5-year period to 122 cases in the latter period was noted. The authors state that the recruitment of an endocrine surgeon with experience in LA might explain the increase in the latter 5 years. They also note that increased imaging, which has identified more adrenal incidentalomas, and greater emphasis placed on endocrine disease at their center are other possible reasons for the growth.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles