Invited Critique |

Trends in Management and Prognosis for Esophageal Cancer—Invited Critique

David W. McFadden, MD
Arch Surg. 2009;144(3):254. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2008.560.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The review by Ruol et al of data from nearly 3500 patients with esophageal cancer treated at the University of Padova during a 25-year period confirms much of our current understanding of esophageal cancer. There have been changes in tumor location (proximal to distal) and histological type (squamous cell carcinoma to adenocarcinoma), enhanced multidisciplinary treatment algorithms, and improved surgical mortality and overall survival rates. According to Ruol et al, most of their patients, even in the most recent time period from 1996-2004, had squamous cell carcinoma. In addition, most patients were treated with thoracotomy-based resections, and, enviably, more than 70% of patients had 15 or more lymph nodes resected. Increasing use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy was temporally associated with increased R0 resection and long-term survival rates. The authors comment that a history of Barrett esophagus was disclosed in less than 30% of patients with adenocarcinoma, data that may lead to improved use of screening endoscopy in their population. They do not comment on the presence of Barrett epithelium in the resected specimens.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles