We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Survival Analysis in Amputees Based on Physical Independence Grade Achievement—Invited Critique

Michael T. Watkins, MD
Arch Surg. 2009;144(6):552. doi:10.1001/archsurg.144.6.552.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Stineman and colleagues studied the effect of functional recovery on survival after lower extremity amputation in a population of military veterans. This retrospective study used a published validated Physical Independence Grading System to express meaningful physical function profiles of progressive independence over time. They hypothesized that functional grades achieved by amputees would serve as predictors of mortality risk even after accounting for other risk factors. A large number of patients did not recover past the first grade of physical independence, indicating severe physical dysfunction in this cohort. Primarily, younger unmarried patients with fewer interventions achieved higher functional grades of physical activity, an intuitively reasonable conclusion. Concomitant with this observation was the finding that amputation level was not associated with mortality after adjusting for demographic data and other clinical characteristics; however, the overall age was still related to 6-month mortality. The finding that amputation level did not predict mortality is somewhat counterintuitive on the basis of what is known about limited mobility in patients who have undergone above-knee vs below-knee amputation. The authors mention that the physiologic effects associated with age and amputation level affect functional recovery and, thereby, influence mortality. This point indicates the weakness of the clinical parameters in this study and similar analyses used to predict mortality and outcome. In the absence of physiologic, proteomic, or genotypic analysis, these results must be interpreted with caution. Recent research initiatives in studies of patients who have experienced trauma have created funding opportunities (“glue” grant [http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-07-412.html], National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health) that match analysis of clinical parameters with proteomic and genomic analysis of patients to predict and understand the complexities of outcome and recovery. These initiatives must be extended to the patient population with vascular disease undergoing rehabilitation to obtain data that will be more predictive of mortality and functional recovery.



Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles