Invited Critique |

Getting Old Shouldn't Be an Emergency:  Comment on “Factors Predicting Morbidity and Mortality in Emergency Colorectal Procedures in Elderly Patients”

James W. Fleshman, MD
Arch Surg. 2009;144(12):1162. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.202.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


As a Baby Boomer, I find this article depressing. Whatever happened to “65 is the new 45”? McGillicudy et al have provided us with a picture of worsening outcomes as our population ages, especially if the patient presents at the end of the disease spectrum when emergency care becomes necessary. The authors emphasize that preventive care for patients in the area of colorectal disease as well as comorbidities will benefit the patient and society. The high perforation/obstruction rate for colorectal cancer in the group (30%) suggests that education of primary care physicians and patients regarding appropriate screening measures may be a useful way to spend a portion of President Obama's stimulus package. This might lead to a reduction of medical expenditures as emergency care costs and the high cost of complications disappear without penalizing physicians for allowing “never” events to occur in high-risk patients. The authors also emphasize that a raised level of awareness and appropriate surveillance for cardiopulmonary complications in this patient population may improve outcomes. Because all patients older than 65 years have access to health care already, access to care should not be as significant a factor as the authors suggest. Once again, awareness on the part of patients and primary care physicians is important.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles