Correspondence |

More Bad News for the Uninsured

Ellen Meara, PhD
Arch Surg. 2010;145(6):604. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.100.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The recent article by Rosen and colleagues1 presents a sobering reminder that insurance does matter for health, precisely in situations in which the health of patients is most in jeopardy, such as trauma. Unfortunately, as is so often the case when different disciplines fail to interact, the authors missed an opportunity to strengthen support for their findings. They overlooked a carefully designed 2005 study of automobile crash victims in which at least 1 other fatality occurred.2 In the 2005 study, Doyle used detailed data on the nature of automobile crashes linked to hospital discharge data and mortality status for automobile crashes in Wisconsin. Doyle demonstrated that mortality rates were 1.5 percentage points higher for uninsured accident victims compared with insured accident victims, a 40% increase over the mean mortality rate of 3.8%. The uninsured victims also received 20% less medical care (measured by length of stay and spending) than insured comparisons. The mortality estimate in the Doyle study is nearly identical to that in the Rosen et al study (Doyle's estimate would yield an odds ratio of 1.4, the same found in the Rosen et al study). The clinical richness of the current study nicely complements the careful effort to remove confounding factors in the prior study. Together, these and other evidence referenced in the article argue more strongly than ever for the value of health insurance coverage, not simply for financial protection, but to improve health.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





June 1, 2010
Heather Rosen, MD, MPH; Fady Saleh, MD, MPH; Stuart R. Lipsitz, ScD; Selwyn O. Rogers, Jr; Atul A. Gawande, MD, MPH
Arch Surg. 2010;145(6):604-605. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.101.
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics