0
Correspondence |

Association With a High Number of Lymph Nodes and Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer

Kjetil Søreide, MD, PhD; Bjørn S. Nedrebø, MD; Jon Arne Søreide, MD, PhD; Hartwig Kørner, MD, PhD
Arch Surg. 2010;145(8):799. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.146.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

We read with interest the recent article in the Archives in which Eveno et al1 report on the association between a high lymph node count and the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly for stage I and II CRC. We find these results particularly exciting as they are in line with our recent findings, albeit for colon cancers only.2 Notably, we also found that MSI is associated with a higher lymph node count in general,2 and MSI was an independent factor in multivariate analysis for a lymph node count of 12 or more in stage II to III colon cancer (adjusted odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.0; P = .03). As the average lymph node count was different in the 2 studies,1,2 we agree with Eveno et al that it would be relevant to confirm the results in larger cohorts of patients undergoing surgery for CRC. We concur with the authors that, “definitive conclusion regarding the biological association between lymphoid reaction to the tumor and MSI status is confounded by that fact that MSI tumors are more common in the proximal colon, where mesentery and lymph nodes may tend to be quantitatively greater.”1 The association of MSI with tumor location in the proximal colon is well described3 and was also confirmed in a previous study from our institution.4 Thus, much remains to be investigated and learned concerning the tumor biology and effects of MSI in colorectal cancers. In agreement with the data from Eveno et al, we also suggest that, with the current knowledge, the number of examined lymph nodes per se cannot be used as a reliable criterion of the quality of surgical or pathologic dissection. This has also recently been argued based on data from large, population-based cohorts as well.5 Nevertheless, the lymph node status (pN) still appears to be the best prognostic factor for patients undergoing curative resection of CRC.4

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

August 1, 2010
Clarisse Eveno, MD; Judith Nemeth, MD; Hany Soliman, MD; Françoise Praz, MD, PhD; Hugues de The, MD, PhD; Patrice Valleur, MD; Ian C. Talbot, MD, PhD; Marc Pocard, MD, PhD
Arch Surg. 2010;145(8):799-800. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.147.
CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Resolution

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Scenario

brightcove.createExperiences();