We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Commentary |

Limitations in Resident Work Hours Are We Preaching to the Choir? That Is the Question!

Samir Johna, MD
Arch Surg. 2011;146(1):11. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.293.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Limitations in resident working hours were sparked by the death of 18-year-old Libby Zion in a New York hospital in 1984. Libby's father, Sydney, left no stone unturned to ensure the implementation of restriction on residents' working hours after his daughter died under the care of inexperienced and overworked young physicians.1 In July 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandated such restriction, which became the subject of heated debate between those who entrenched themselves on either side of the fence. The epidemic extended well beyond the US borders where restrictions are even harder than ours. Among the primary goals of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education were enhancement of patient safety, providing a friendly learning environment, and a decent quality of life for residents. However, there was a concern that such restrictions may backfire when it comes to the quality of education and the very safety of the patients it was implemented for. The gap between the pros and cons is even wider when surgical education is considered because residents not only need to acquire medical knowledge but also develop the manual dexterity and—this may be as important—the strength and endurance to perform procedures and provide total care.2

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

2 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Scenario

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Matching Content and Context: Evidence-Based Teaching Scripts