Invited Critique |

Improving Outcomes: The Importance of Data Monitoring and Ongoing Educational Interventions:  Comment on “Trends in Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Trauma-Surgical Intensive Care Unit”

Leigh A. Neumayer, MD, MS
Arch Surg. 2011;146(3):307. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.10.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In their report, Ong et al present a detailed account of how they in essence have developed a “best practice” for central line insertion and care in their surgical critical unit. With these data, the authors elegantly display the effect of the interventions as their central line–associated infection rate dropped to near zero, and they have been successful in maintaining this for 2½ years. There are several written and unwritten take-home points. First, looking at data specific to you and your institution is of utmost importance. This in and of itself is sometimes enough to improve outcomes. Second, comparing your outcomes with national data will allow interventions where they are needed. Third, Ong et al developed and implemented an evidence-based educational intervention that included standardization of their protocols. Fourth, they have ongoing educational interventions along with mentoring by qualified personnel to help maintain their gain (or, in this case, loss/reduction of catheter-related infections). Their report is sufficiently detailed in the processes that any institution could replicate the experiment and should obtain similar results. In addition, they recognized by comparing their results against national data that their rate of central line utilization is higher than most, and this will likely be the target of their next intervention.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics