Invited Critique |

Sorting Through the Evidence of Adult Pneumatosis Intestinalis as a Harbinger for Disaster vs Benign Disease:  Comment on “Computed Tomographic Diagnosis of Pneumatosis Intestinalis”

Nabil A. Atweh, MD; Lee F. Starker, MD
Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):511. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.96.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Since pneumatosis intestinalis was first described by Duvernoy in 1754,1 interest in deciphering its etiology, progression, and optimal management has shown a broad spectrum of presentation and prognosis. With the increased use of abdominal CT, more cases are being diagnosed.

Duron and colleagues have accumulated the largest series to date of patients diagnosed as having pneumatosis intestinalis using a CT data registry. They have confirmed that pneumatosis intestinalis detected radiographically is not an independent variable in determining the need for operative intervention. Radiographic studies should be used as an adjunct to physical examination and other clinical data. The spectrum of outcomes in their study correlates with the multiple causes of this pathological finding. Older studies revealed a high concentration of hydrogen gas in the subserosal pockets, supporting anaerobic bacterial fermentation as a cause.2 Gas occasionally seeps into the peritoneal cavity or portomesenteric circulation. This may suggest a disruption of mucosal integrity by increased intraluminal pressure or overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria that could be facilitated by an autoimmune disease or ischemia.2

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles