We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Sorting Through the Evidence of Adult Pneumatosis Intestinalis as a Harbinger for Disaster vs Benign Disease Comment on “Computed Tomographic Diagnosis of Pneumatosis Intestinalis”

Nabil A. Atweh, MD; Lee F. Starker, MD
Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):511. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.96.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Since pneumatosis intestinalis was first described by Duvernoy in 1754,1 interest in deciphering its etiology, progression, and optimal management has shown a broad spectrum of presentation and prognosis. With the increased use of abdominal CT, more cases are being diagnosed.

Duron and colleagues have accumulated the largest series to date of patients diagnosed as having pneumatosis intestinalis using a CT data registry. They have confirmed that pneumatosis intestinalis detected radiographically is not an independent variable in determining the need for operative intervention. Radiographic studies should be used as an adjunct to physical examination and other clinical data. The spectrum of outcomes in their study correlates with the multiple causes of this pathological finding. Older studies revealed a high concentration of hydrogen gas in the subserosal pockets, supporting anaerobic bacterial fermentation as a cause.2 Gas occasionally seeps into the peritoneal cavity or portomesenteric circulation. This may suggest a disruption of mucosal integrity by increased intraluminal pressure or overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria that could be facilitated by an autoimmune disease or ischemia.2

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles