0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Stents for Palliation of Obstructive Metastatic Colon Cancer—Invited Critique

Wilbur B. Bowne, MD; Michael E. Zenilman, MD
Arch Surg. 2007;142(7):623. doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.7.623.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Dr Karoui and colleagues present a timely, thought-provoking study comparing SEMS with operative management in the setting of obstructing colon cancer with unresectable distant disease. Their experience with this technique further underscores the potential efficacy, safety, and equivalency compared with palliative surgery.1 However, their enthusiasm stems mostly from demonstrating a significant benefit with decreased hospital stay, stoma formation, and time to chemotherapy—hence, less morbidity. Their proposed paradigm shift from palliative surgery to a less-is-more or bridging-treatment approach appears more relevant when considering that (1) palliative surgery delays administering systemic chemotherapy; (2) recent advances with systemic therapies have improved median survivals approaching 2 years; and (3) operative salvage can be offered in select patients with demonstrable tumor regression (downstaging) or without tumor progression—a distinct survival advantage.24

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();