We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Correspondence and Brief Communications |

Pancreatic Head Excavation: An Update

Dana K. Andersen, MD; Mark D. Topazian, MD
Arch Surg. 2005;140(1):98. doi:10.1001/archsurg.140.1.98-b.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Since the publication of our article titled “Pancreatic Head Excavation: A Variation on the Theme of Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection,”1 we have become aware of 2 other reports that had previously described a similar technical variation. In 2001, Gloor et al2 from the University of Bern in Switzerland described a similar variation of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, which they advocated for patients with chronic pancreatitis associated with portal hypertension. These authors described the use of this method “in a few patients” without providing details of outcome. In 2003, Farkas et al3 from the University of Szeged in Hungary reported on 30 patients with chronic pancreatitis in whom a similar method had been employed. They observed the uniform absence of major complications, as we did, and the absence of symptoms after 6 to 14 months of follow-up. Subsequently, in June 2004, at the 36th Annual Meeting of the European Pancreatic Club in Padova, Italy, these same authors from the University of Szeged provided an updated report of then 100 patients with chronic pancreatitis in whom this technique had been used.4

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles