We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Carotid Endarterectomy in Nonagenarians—Invited Critique

David A. Mayer, MD
Arch Surg. 2005;140(7):628. doi:10.1001/archsurg.140.7.628.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The NASCET demonstrated the highest level of absolute risk reduction for carotid endarterectomy performed in patients 75 years and older (28.9%). Operative risk also decreased with increasing age in this trial. This, together with the increased morbidity of stroke in the elderly patients, provides a rationale for studying the effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy in nonagenarian patients. The authors are to be commended for their excellent results in treating a small subset of 26 patients 89 years or older with carotid endarterectomy; these patients were essentially devoid of perioperative stroke and cardiac morbidity. One could argue that this was a relatively healthy group of very elderly patients without the usual comorbid risk factors present in the typical vascular surgery patient population. Nevertheless, many surgeons would still consider nonagenarians to be at increased risk for perioperative complications. Because the morbidity and mortality of carotid endarterectomy has been shown to be inversely proportional to surgeon and facility volume, a case could be made for operating on such a high-risk group at regionalized centers. This is particularly relevant because unusual technical difficulties, such as high carotid bifurcations, dense adherence of surrounding tissues, and looping internal carotid arteries requiring derotation, were common.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Updated Literature Search

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence Summary and Review 5