We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Special Article |

Claude H. Organ, Jr, MD, as Resident Advisor FREE

Alden H. Harken, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.

Arch Surg. 2005;140(11):1044. doi:10.1001/archsurg.140.11.1044.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

In the late afternoon of Saturday, June 18, 2005, our 7 chief residents convened at the Claremont Hotel in Berkeley, Calif, to celebrate their traditional graduation dinner. News circulated that Dr Organ had just died. One of the chiefs broke down. I was surprised. My guess is that he had not cried in 30 years. Dr Organ was a powerful presence in our department. We wrestled with the idea of canceling the graduation ceremony. It soon became clear, however, that Dr Organ had planned and precisely timed this inevitable event. It was logical that he pass his professional baton to this new wave of young surgeons at exactly this moment. He was intensely proud of his residents. And, it was clear that he was much more than a department chair to them. But, it was tough love. Excellence was the only acceptable standard, and either you measured up or you did not—there was no gray zone.

Fifteen years ago, Dr Organ saw an opportunity to coalesce 3 struggling surgical programs into a single residency unit within the University of California system. By virtue of his leadership at the American Board of Surgery, Philadelphia, Pa, and the Residency Review Committee for Surgery, he (not the program) was trusted. Claude insisted on a formal university base and complete university integration. I would not have been that smart. He later explained that you want to relate most formally with the group whose goals are most concordant with your own. This has subsequently proven a blessing.

Indeed, as blessings go, Claude and his wife Betty were happily religious. Claude loved to quote scripture to seal an argument. The implication, of course, was that he had recently descended from the mountaintop, that he had possession of the Tablets, and that, as he spoke as an extension of the Lord, he was the reluctant but committed purveyor of truth. This dialectical strategy proved persuasively overwhelming to all but the rare opponent.

Claude loved to spend time with the residents as an advisor, mentor, counselor, and friend. His door was always open. On frequent occasion as I passed Claude’s office, I noted a resident engrossed in conversation. On delightfully frequent occasion, Claude would invite me in or drop by my office. He was always embarrassingly sensitive to any potential inconvenience. He loved to talk about local, regional, and national surgical issues. He also delighted in sharing his liberal political views, teasing his more conservative colleagues, or sharing a recent quip from Molly Ivins. He was always gratifyingly protective of me and the residents. His observations and advice were sensitive and thoughtful but spiked with subtle wit.

In creating an extraordinarily successful surgical residency program, Claude Organ’s accomplishment is reminiscent of Barbara Jordan’s 1977 Harvard commencement address in which she said: “What the people [surgical residents] want is simple. They want an America [surgical residency] as good as its promise.” Dr Organ provided that.


Correspondence: Alden H. Harken, MD, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 1411 E 31st St, Oakland, CA 94602 (harkena@surgery.ucsf.edu).

Accepted for Publication: August 31, 2005.





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Clinical Scenario

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Matching Content and Context: Evidence-Based Teaching Scripts