We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Does Surgeon Volume Matter for Gastric Cancer Surgery?  Comment on “Surgeon Subspecialty as a Factor in Improving Long-term Outcomes for Gastric Cancer”

Vivian E. Strong, MD
Arch Surg. 2010;145(11):1096-1097. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.224.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Jang et al present a well-done study concluding that surgeon subspecialty is an important factor in improving survival for patients with gastric cancer. The authors conclude that high-volume gastric surgeons (those performing ≥50 gastric cancer operations per year) provide better outcomes for patients.

The topic of surgical subspecialization has been widely debated in the field of surgical oncology. Studies have established that operations such as pancreaticoduodenectomy, when performed at high-volume centers, improve patient outcomes.1 For gastric cancer, this is more difficult to study given the relatively lower incidence of this disease in the United States than in Eastern countries. In the United States, a high-volume gastric cancer center is defined as one performing 14 or more gastric cancer operations per year.2 Only 2 or 3 centers in the United States are performing more than 50 gastric cancer operations per year, including my own center. Therefore, this study has significant strength in numbers; however, the reason for better outcomes could be better defined. It is logical that a surgeon with extensive experience in a particular procedure that is performed in high volume is likely to achieve a more efficient and precise resection, especially with regard to a complete lymphadenectomy, needed for appropriate staging to define adjuvant treatment. However, additional factors may be involved, including the value of a tertiary care facility, where the ability to “rescue” a patient who sustains a complication is better. The authors do not give specific data on complications in the 2 groups compared, and it would have been helpful to identify whether the more experienced surgeons had fewer complications or were better able to recognize complications that occurred. The weaknesses of this article are acknowledged by the authors, including the impact of the long period of the study given the many advances in surgical technique, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment patterns, and changes in the epidemiology of gastric cancer (more proximal lesions). However, given the complexity of addressing this topic, this is a well-done study that raises awareness of the impact of volume and subspecialization for gastric cancer.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis