0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

COMPARATIVE VALUE OF SOME BLOOD SUBSTITUTES USED FOR TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL SHOCK

CHARLES C. SCOTT, M.D., Ph.D.; HAROLD M. WORTH, A.B.; E. BROWN ROBBINS
Arch Surg. 1944;48(4):315-318. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1944.01230010325006.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

In shock resulting from hemorrhage, trauma or burns, therapy with intravenous injection of fluid is well established as decidedly beneficial. Numerous investigations deal with the value of blood and various blood substitutes in shock. This is partly owing to the desire to find a blood substitute which is highly efficient, readily available, relatively inexpensive and completely safe. Plasma or serum fulfils all requirements except that it is costly. In addition, to bring it to a readily available form, a vast amount of work is required. The great value of plasma outweighs these objections during emergencies such as the present war. In peacetime, these difficulties have considerable practical importance.

Although the use of blood substitutes in the treatment of shock has been widely studied, the results have often been conflicting. In such circumstances, further work is indicated, with attempts to control or standardize procedures more effectively. The present report is concerned

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();