0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

Villous Adenoma, a Surgical Dilemma

RICHARD D. LIECHTY, MD; LEO RATERMAN, MD
Arch Surg. 1963;87(1):107-111. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1963.01310130109014.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Introduction  The dilemma of radical versus conservative treatment ultimately confronts every surgeon who treats a patient with a villous adenoma (Fig 1). These friable, velvety, often extensive tumors defy precise diagnosis. They may grow to encompass the entire circumference of the bowel. Despite multiple biopsies without evidence of malignancy, the question often remains whether malignancy actually exists but has not been biopsied. Compounding this dilemma is the increased operative risk in the advanced age group in which this lesion commonly occurs. Is the surgeon justified in performing local excision of these tumors when multiple biopsies and gross appearance reveal no evidence of malignancy? Or should all villous tumors be treated by more extensive resection?5 This study offers support for the conservative approach in the management of these tumors.

Materials and Methods  Grossly malignant lesions histologically confirmed as such were excluded from this study. Only sessile tumors were included which

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();