We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Conservative Management of Esophageal Perforation

Arch Surg. 1965;91(2):238-240. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1965.01320140028006.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Introduction  SINCE the impetus given endoscopy by Chevalier Jackson in the early years of this century, esophagoscopy has remained a valuable adjunct to the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal disease. Perforation of this thin-walled organ has, however, remained a constant source of worry to the endoscopist. Until 1940, perforation of the esophagus was accompanied by an appalling mortality rate. Subsequently it became recognized that early surgical intervention with closure of the perforation dramatically reduced this mortality rate. The present study gives our experience with nonoperative treatment of esophageal perforation resulting from endoscopy and highlights the impact of antibiotics on this dread complication.In 1948, Jemerin,1 in analyzing esophageal perforations of diverse etiologies, reported a mortality rate of 69% in patients treated non-operatively. He was able to reduce this mortality rate dramatically with the introduction of early drainage of the mediastinum and closure of the perforation, or both. Most large


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.