Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

A Comparative Study of Intestinal Anastomoses

A. O. Singleton Jr., BA, MD; Dezra White, BA; Philip Montalbo, BA
Arch Surg. 1968;96(4):563-566. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1968.01330220079014.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


INVERTING serosa-to-serosa intestinal anastomoses have been generally accepted as the procedure of choice in making a union between two bowel segments. Two other methods have recently appeared in the surgical literature: the inserting of the proximal end of the bowel into the distal portion in conjunction with the use of adhesives and the more startling use of an eversion rather than inversion type of anastomosis.1-6 We have been dissatisfied with the conventional inverting anastomosis in the dog where bowel thickness and spasm make suturing more difficult than in the human. The overlapping technique with sutures instead of adhesives seemed to offer advantages.

A study was carried out in dogs comparing inverting end-to-end anastomoses with an overlapping type using sutures.

Methods  Thirty-three mongrel dogs were used with-out any bowel preparation except withholding food the day before surgery. Eleven of the animals received an overlapping end-to-end anastomosis, 11 received the inverting


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.