We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Malignant Melanoma Delayed Hypersensitivity Skin Testing

Daniel F. Roses, MD; John F. Campion, MD; Matthew N. Harris, MD; Stephen L. Gumport, MD
Arch Surg. 1979;114(1):35-38. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370250037007.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• One hundred eighty-two patients undergoing initial surgical therapy for primary malignant melanoma were evaluated for delayed hypersensitivity using a battery of recall antigens prior to surgery. Fifty-six patients were also sensitized with 2, 4-dinitrochlorobenzene. All tumors were classified by Clark-Mihm levels and the patients were clinically staged. They were followed up for an average period of 55 months. There was no significant difference in the ability of patients with varied Clark-Mihm level lesions to mount a delayed hypersensitivity response to the recall battery or to 2, 4-dinitrochlorobenzene. Thirteen stage I melanoma patients in whom recurrence developed at a distant site exhibited no difference in immune responsiveness when compared to 148 patients in whom recurrence did not develop when both groups were tested with recall antigens. No difference was noted in patients with stage II disease in whom recurrence developed, as measured by reaction to these same antigens. Twelve patients demonstrated anergy to recall antigens, in none of whom has recurrence developed to date.

Fifty-six patients who were tested with 2, 4-dinitrochlorobenzene showed no difference in reactivity with tumors classified at any of the Clark-Mihm levels. Anergy demonstrated by delayed hypersensitivity skin testing appears to reflect increasing tumor burden, rather than a preexisting deficiency that can be used to predict patients at high risk for the development of recurrent disease.

(Arch Surg 114:35-38, 1979)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.