We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Stratified Outcome Comparison of Clindamycin-Gentamicin vs Chloramphenicol-Gentamicin for Treatment of Intra-abdominal Sepsis

E. Stan Lennard, MD, ScD; Barbara H. Minshew, PhD; E. Patchen Dellinger, MD; Margaret J. Wertz, MN, RN; David M. Heimbach, MD; George W. Counts, MD; Fritz D. Schoenknecht, MD; Marie B. Coyle, PhD
Arch Surg. 1985;120(8):889-898. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390320013002.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• A randomized, prospective trial was conducted of 93 patients with operatively confirmed intra-abdominal sepsis. The study compared clindamycin-gentamicin and chloramphenicol-gentamicin for treatment of carefully stratified patient groups. Malnutrition, age over 65 years, shock, alcoholism, gastrointestinal tract bleeding, steroid administration, diabetes, obesity, and organ malfunction were present with equal frequencies in each group. The duration of antibiotic treatment averaged 8½ days, and the average length of postoperative hospitalization was 29 days. Study antibiotics were changed for bacteriologic reasons in 11 patients taking clindamycin-gentamicin and 12 patients taking chloramphenicol-gentamicin (25% of the total), and two patients in the clindamycin-gentamicin group had a minor adverse reaction. Initial satisfactory clinical responses were obtained in 59 (63%) patients. Twenty-five patients (27%) subsequently developed unsatisfactory courses, but 48 (52%) patients remained well through the 30-day period. Septic-related mortality occurred in 18 (19%) patients, and two (2%) patients had unrelated deaths. There were no significant differences between the study regimens by the outcome criteria evaluated.

(Arch Surg 1985;120:889-898)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.