0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

Sepsis From Triple- vs Single-Lumen Catheters During Total Parenteral Nutrition in Surgical or Critically Ill Patients

L. Beaty Pemberton, MD; Beth Lyman, RN; Vicki Lander, RPh; Joel Covinsky, PharmD
Arch Surg. 1986;121(5):591-594. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400050109014.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

• We prospectively studied the infection rates for 59 triple-lumen (TLC) and 68 single-lumen (SLC) subclavian catheters during the administration of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) to surgical or critically ill patients. A standard protocol was used for catheter insertion and maintenance. The infection control committee determined independently whether patients had catheter-related sepsis, an infected insertion site only, or no catheter infection. The TLCs had an increased incidence of catheter sepsis (19%) compared with the SLCs (3%). Low rates (5% for TLCs and 3% for SLCs) of infected catheter sites only indicated that the catheter care was comparable for both groups. The patients in the two groups were similar but not identical; those with TLCs appeared to be sicker and, therefore, at greater risk to develop catheter sepsis than patients with SLC. However, since TLCs were involved in six times more catheter sepsis than were SLCs, limiting the use of a subclavian catheter to giving TPN only and strict adherence to a TPN protocol are necessary to minimize the risk of catheter sepsis.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:591-594)

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();