0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

Changes in the Treatment of Rectal Carcinoma and Effects on Local Recurrence

Mark W. Odou, MD; Theodore X. O'Connell, MD
Arch Surg. 1986;121(10):1114-1116. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400100020002.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

• We divided 563 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma located between 5 and 15 cm from the anal verge, who underwent curative resections, into two groups. The first had surgery from 1973 to 1978, before the introduction of the intraluminal stapling device (ISD), whereas the second group consisted of patients operated on between 1979 and 1983, when the stapler was commonly used. The number of low anterior resections (LARs) dramatically increased from 46% (113/248) during the first period to 62% (196/315) during the second. The major contribution to this increase occurred in tumors of the midrectum (5 to 10 cm), where a threefold rise in LARs was seen. Despite this increase in LARs, local recurrence overall was not significantly affected. Among patients undergoing LARs for midrectal lesions, local recurrence actually decreased from 34% (10/29) to 17% (16/95). This improvement may be secondary to greater distal margins of resection afforded by the ISD. The ISD has allowed more LARs, thus preserving normal bowel function and quality of life without compromising treatment goals.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:1114-1116)

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();