Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Does Radical Mastectomy Still Have a Place in the Treatment of Primary Operable Breast Cancer?

William A. Maddox, MD; John T. Carpenter Jr, MD; Henry T. Laws, MD; Seng-Jaw Soong, PhD; Gretchen Cloud, MS; Charles M. Balch, MD; Marshall M. Urist, MD
Arch Surg. 1987;122(11):1317-1320. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400230103018.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• This study (Alabama Breast Cancer Project) reports the ten-year surgical results of a prospective randomized trial comparing Halsted radical mastectomy (RM) with modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer. We entered 311 patients in the study between 1975 and 1978. Patients with histologically positive axillary lymph nodes were randomized after operation to receive melphalan or intermittent intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil for one year. After a median follow-up of ten years, there was no significant difference in the survival of the two groups (RM, 71%; MRM, 64%). Local recurrence after RM was significantly lower than after MRM. A subset of patients with more advanced cancers (T3 and T2 with clinically positive axillary nodes) experienced significantly better survival at ten years following RM compared with MRM (59% vs 38%, respectively). These results indicate that overall survival is similar for patients treated by either RM or MRM. However, there is subset of patients with more advanced cancers whose ultimate survival can be favorably influenced by RM.

(Arch Surg 1987;122:1317-1320)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.