We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

The Treatment of Achalasia A Current Perspective

Loie Sauer, MD; Carlos A. Pellegrini, MD; Lawrence W. Way, MD
Arch Surg. 1989;124(8):929-932. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410080061009.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• We analyzed the course of 79 adult patients treated for achalasia between 1977 and 1988. Sixty-six patients (84%) had pneumatic dilatation as the primary therapy. Fifty-three patients (80%) had immediate improvement in swallowing. Three patients required immediate redilatation, 2 developed pulmonary aspiration, and 8 (12%) suffered esophageal perforation. Esophageal perforation was treated by closure plus Heller's myotomy in 3 patients, closure only in 3, chest tube in 1, and antibiotics and nasogastric suction in 1. At 4 years' follow-up, 50% of patients who had dilatation remained asymptomatic, 30% had symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, and 20% had persistent dysphagia. Eight Heller myotomies were performed, with excellent results in 7 and 1 postoperative death from respiratory failure. Seven additional patients with disabling esophageal symptoms after multiple operations for achalasia were ultimately treated by esophagectomy (n 5), hemigastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy (n =1), and repeated myotomy (n= 1). All recovered and are able to eat solid food. Thus, our experience indicates that pneumatic dilatation remains unperfected (ie, the line between undertreatment and overtreatment is finer than generally recognized), and unless improvements can be made, the role for surgery may need to be reexpanded.

(Arch Surg. 1989;124:929-932)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.