We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Ablation of Abnormal Energy Expenditure by Curative Tumor Resection

James D. Luketich, MD; James L. Mullen, MD; Irene D. Feurer, MSEd; Jonathan Sternlieb, MD; Robert C. Fried, MD
Arch Surg. 1990;125(3):337-341. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410150059011.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• Resting energy expenditure is abnormal in most patients with cancer and may contribute to cancer cachexia. These metabolic abnormalities may be a direct measure of tumor metabolism, or represent alterations in the size or activity of the body cell mass, or both. To unravel this pathogenesis, we prospectively studied 68 preoperative patients with cancer about to undergo curative resection by measuring resting energy expenditure before and after tumor resection. The preoperative measured resting energy expenditure was compared with expected resting energy expenditure based on Harris-Benedict resting energy expenditure predictions: 10 patients were hypometabolic (<90% Harris-Benedict); 35 were normometabolic (90% to 110% HarrisBenedict); and 23 were hypermetabolic (>110% Harris-Benedict). Using each patient as his or her own control, resting energy expenditure normalized or remained normal following curative resection. In contrast, after palliative resection, resting energy expenditure remained hypermetabolic or significantly increased toward hypermetabolism. Tumor induces an abnormal metabolic rate, since tumor removal results in prompt normalization of resting energy expenditure. The abnormal energy expenditure of patients with cancer cannot be solely attributed to abnormal host body composition.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:337-341)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.