We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Comparison of Different Techniques of Stapled Bowel Anastomoses in a Canine Model

Michael L. Ritchey, MD; Kevin P. Lally, MD; Robert Ostericher, MD
Arch Surg. 1993;128(12):1365-1367. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420240073014.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Objective:  To evaluate different methods of creating a stapled enteroanastomosis and to determine which method would create a larger anastomosis.

Design:  Prospective comparison of three groups with a total of 17 mongrel dogs.

Setting:  Clinical investigation facility.

Main Outcome Measures:  Stapled side-to-side enteroanastomoses were created with the stapled edges touching or separated. Anastomoses were created in both functional bowel and in a defunctionalized limb. The anastomotic circumference was measured in a blinded fashion after 28 days. The third group had anastomoses created and measured the same day. Groups were compared using the t test.

Results:  There was significant narrowing after healing with both types of anastomoses. Anastomoses created by separating the stapled lines were larger than those fashioned with the cut edges touching, both immediately and after healing.

Conclusions:  While clinically significant narrowing of a stapled anastomosis is uncommon, separating the staple lines of a functional end-to-end anastomosis may be the preferable method.(Arch Surg. 1993;128:1365-1367)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.