The Oxygen Cost of Breathing May Predict Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation Better Than the Respiratory Rate to Tidal Volume Ratio

Scott A. Shikora, MD; Peter N. Benotti, MD; Jay A. Johannigman, MD
Arch Surg. 1994;129(3):269-274. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420270045011.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective:  To compare the respiratory rate to tidal volume ratio with the oxygen cost of breathing to see which could more accurately predict the outcome of ventilator weaning for surgical patients.

Design:  Prospective comparison of two modalities used to predict the likelihood of successful ventilator weaning.

Patients:  Twenty-eight consecutive patiens with chronic respiratory insufficiency requiring long-term mechanical ventilation in the surgical intensive care unit at New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, Mass, were studied.

Main Outcome Measures:  The oxygen cost of breathing and the respiratory rate to tidal volume ratio were measured during spontaneous breathing. Patients extubated within 2 weeks of being studied were designated as extubated while patients not extubated within this period or requiring reintubation were recorded as not extubated.

Results:  The oxygen cost of breathing predicted succesful extubation in all five patients who were extubated, and failure in 20 of 23 patients who could not be extubated (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 87%). In contrast, the respiratory rate to tidal volume ratio predicted extubation for only two of five patients who were extubated and predicted failure in only 12 of 23 patients who could not be extubated (sensitivity, 40%; specificity, 52%).

Conclusion:  For this group of patients requiring prolonged ventilation, the oxygen cost of breathing proved to be a more reliable predictor of both successful extubation and failure.(Arch Surg. 1994;129:269-274)


Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.