0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

Could the Piggyback Operation in Liver Transplantation Be Routinely Used?

Manuel G. Fleitas, MD; Daniel Casanova, MD; Esteban Martino, MD; Jose M. Maestre, MD; Luis Herrera, MD; Fernando Hernanz, MD; Jose M. Rabanal, MD; Severino Pulgar, MD; Gumersindo Solares, MD
Arch Surg. 1994;129(8):842-845. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420320068013.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective:  To determine if orthotopic liver transplantation with inferior vena cava preservation, performed without using caval cross clamping or venovenous bypass, can minimize hemodynamic instability and low renal perfusion pressure.

Design:  A prospective case series of 44 consecutive adult orthotopic liver transplantations, with a maximum follow-up of 30 months.

Setting:  An institutional university referral center.

Patients:  Between November 1990 and May 1993, 39 consecutive adult liver transplant recipients underwent transplantation with the following primary diagnoses: alcoholic cirrhosis (n=23), viral cirrhosis (n=9), primary biliary cirrhosis (n=2), Wilson's disease (n=2), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n=1), fulminant hepatic failure (n=1), and secondary hepatic malignant neoplasm (n=1); five had repeated orthotopic liver transplantation.

Intervention:  Orthotopic liver transplantations were performed using the piggyback technique, but with placement of the vascular clamp on the inferior vena cava laterally instead of across it so that it remained patent throughout the anhepatic stage. Favorable anatomic conditions in the recipients were not considered; venovenous bypass was not used.

Main Outcome Measures:  Intraoperative hemodynamic profile, blood loss and replacement, surgical time and complications, and patient survival.

Results:  No significant hemodynamic changes with lateral clamping and no increases in surgical complications, rate of retransplantation, blood product requirements, or survival rate compared with the standard procedure.

Conclusion:  The piggyback operation could be routinely used in orthotopic liver transplantation.(Arch Surg. 1994;129:842-845)

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();