Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

A Decade of Reduced Gram-negative Infections and Mortality Associated With Improved Isolation of Burned Patients

Albert T. McManus, PhD; Arthur D. Mason Jr, MD; William F. McManus, MD; Basil A. Pruitt Jr, MD
Arch Surg. 1994;129(12):1306-1309. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420360096013.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Objective:  To compare the incidence of gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) and mortality in patients with large burns (≥20% of total body surface) hospitalized in either an open ward (OW) or a single-bed isolation (1W) environment.

Design:  Retrospective cohort study.

Setting:  The US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Burn Center, Ft Sam Houston, Tex.

Patients:  Two thousand five hundred nineteen consecutive patients with large burns divided into two 10-year cohorts. Patients in the first cohort period were treated under OW conditions; patients in the second cohort period, under IW conditions. Infection (bacteremia) data were from a laboratory database. A microbial surveillance system was used to monitor patient isolation. Mortality was compared with predicted mortality derived by logistic regression of outcome, burn size, and age of patients without bacteremia in the study.

Main Outcome Measures:  Presence of GNB and survival.

Results:  The incidence of GNB was higher in the OW cohort (31.2%) than the 1W cohort (12.0%) (P<.001). The postinjury time of first GNB was delayed in the IW vs the OW cohort (28.9 days vs 11.8 days, respectively) (P<.001). For patients who had GNB in the OW cohort, mortality was higher than predicted (observed-predicted mortality ratio, 1.61) (P<.001). Such increased mortality was not present in the IW cohort. Multiple antibiotic-resistant gram-negative pathogens were endemic in the OW cohort. There was no evidence of cross infection or endemic conditions with multiple antibiotic-resistant gram-negative pathogens in the IW cohort.

Conclusion:  Improvements in isolation of burned patients were associated with decreased incidence of GNB, delayed postinjury time of GNB, and improved survival. Improved survival is likely related to decreased susceptibility as a result of longer exposure to the benefits of treatment and wound closure. These results suggest that, in patients with severe burn injuries, gram-negative infections and the related mortality can largely be prevented.(Arch Surg. 1994;129:1306-1309)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.