We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Comparative Evaluation of Educational Methods in Surgical Resident Education

Terence P. Wade, MD; Donald L. Kaminski, MD
Arch Surg. 1995;130(1):83-87. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430010085017.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Objective:  To determine the influence of study methods on American Board of Surgery (ABS) examination performance.

Design:  Performance on ABS examinations by and faculty evaluations of 54 categorical surgical residents from 1976 to 1992 were correlated with the residents' use of commonly available educational methods (text-books, Selected Readings in General Surgery, grand rounds, preceptor guidance, clinical surgery review courses, surgical science review courses, Surgical Education and Self-Assessment Program [SESAP], and continuing medical education lectures) in early, late, and after residency.

Setting:  An average-sized midwestern US university surgical residency.

Results:  Residents who consistently scored above the 33rd percentile on ABS examinations had used texts early, Selected Readings later, and SESAP after residency more frequently than those with ABS In-Training Examination scores in the lower one third. Selected Readings and clinical review courses were associated with significant increases in ABS percentile scores when used in late or after residency and, along with SESAP, were used when residents improved their low ABS In-Training Examination scores.

Conclusions:  Independent study methods are the most effective pathway to successful ABS examination performance. Formal surgical review courses may help improve the ABS examination scores of residents at a higher risk of failure.(Arch Surg. 1995;130:83-87)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.