We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

The Effect of Regional Trauma Care Systems on Costs

Ted R. Miller, PhD; David T. Levy, PhD
Arch Surg. 1995;130(2):188-193. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430020078014.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Objective:  To assess cost savings from regional trauma care systems.

Design:  Multivariate regression analysis is used to isolate the effects of regional trauma care systems on medical costs while controlling for personal and injury characteristics and other factors likely to influence medical costs. Percentage reductions in costs are translated into dollar cost savings with corrections for excluded costs and losses from premature death.

Setting:  Injuries to workers filing workers' compensation lost workday claims.

Participants:  Randomly sampled workers' compensation claims from 17 states filed between 1979 and 1988 (N=217 000).

Main Outcome Measure:  Medical payments per episode of four injury groups: lower-extremity fractures and dislocations, upper-extremity fractures and dislocations, other upper-extremity injuries, and back strains and sprains. We distinguish hospitalized from nonhospitalized claims.

Results:  Statistical analyses reveal that states with trauma care systems have 15.5% lower costs per hospitalized injury episode. Savings average $1025 per case in 1988 dollars. Costs per episode for disabling nonhospitalized injury are 10% lower in states with trauma care systems, with savings averaging $75 per case. The largest savings are for back injuries.

Conclusions:  Extending trauma care systems nationwide could lower annual medical care payments by $3.2 billion. Including productivity losses due to premature death, the savings could total $10.3 billion, 5.9% of national injury costs.(Arch Surg. 1995;130:188-193)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.