We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Esophageal Resection With Colon Interposition for End-Stage Achalasia

Jeffrey H. Peters, MD; Werner K. H. Kauer, MD; Peter F. Crookes, MD; Adrian P. Ireland, MD; Cedric G. Bremner, MD; Tom R. DeMeester, MD
Arch Surg. 1995;130(6):632-637. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430060070013.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Objective:  To review the potential benefits of esophageal resection with colon interposition in patients with achalasia.

Design:  Retrospective review.

Setting:  University-based tertiary care center.

Patients:  Nineteen patients (13 men, six women; median age, 44 years; age range, 26 to 77 years) with achalasia and recurrent or persistent dysphagia despite a variety of previous treatments.

Interventions:  Esophageal resection and replacement with colon interposition.

Main Outcome Measures:  Mortality and morbidity of the procedure, symptomatic outcome, nutritional impact, ability to ingest a meal, and overall patient satisfaction.

Results:  Follow-up results were available in 15 patients. The procedure accounted for no deaths and complications in four patients. Outcome assessment was done at a median of 6 years (range, 1 to 14 years) after resection. Overall, the symptomatic outcome was excellent to good in 12 patients. Eleven of the 15 patients gained weight (median weight loss, 6.3 kg) after the procedure. Thirteen patients were able to eat three meals daily; seven had the capacity to eat a steak dinner; five, an airline meal; and three, a snack. Nine of the 15 patients enjoyed an unrestricted diet. The speed of ingesting a meal was reduced in that most (11 of 15) were the last to finish when eating in a group. Fourteen of the 15 believed that the operation had cured or improved their preoperative symptoms, and a similar percentage were satisfied with the overall outcome of surgery. Most patients (12 of 15) would have the operation again.

Conclusions:  Esophageal replacement for end-stage achalasia can be accomplished with safety and marked improvement of preoperative symptoms. Despite multiple previous therapeutic failures, normal alimentation was restored in the majority of patients, with 93% judging the operation to be highly beneficial, improving their quality of life. Based on this success, guidelines for resection in end-stage achalasia are established.(Arch Surg. 1995;130:632-637)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.