We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......

Laparoscopic Splenectomy:  The Initial Experience at University of California, San Francisco

Laurence F. Yee, MD; Samuel H. Carvajal, MD; Alfred A. de Lorimier, MD; Sean J. Mulvihill, MD
Arch Surg. 1995;130(8):874-879. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430080076012.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective:  To evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) at a single institution.

Design:  Case control.

Setting:  University teaching hospital.

Patients:  The medical records of the initial 25 consecutive patients who underwent LS at a single institution were reviewed. For comparison, a control group of 25 patients undergoing open splenectomy (OS) matched for age, diagnosis, and splenic weight were also reviewed.

Main Outcome Measures:  Data regarding operative time, blood loss, pathologic findings, complications, postoperative hospital stay, ileus duration, preoperative and postoperative hematocrit and platelet counts, blood and platelet transfusions, and hospital costs were collected.

Results:  Twenty-five patients underwent attempted LS. Four procedures (16%) were converted to OS. Operative time averaged 3.3±0.2 hours for LS and 2.6±0.1 hours for OS (P=.001). In the LS group, a regular diet was tolerated 2.1±0.3 days after surgery (P<.001), and mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.1±0.6 days (P=.037), compared with 4.3±0.3 and 6.7±0.5 days, respectively, in the OS group. No differences were observed in blood loss, complication rate, transfusion requirement, or hospital cost.

Conclusions:  Compared with OS, LS requires more operative time, is comparable in blood loss, transfusion requirement, complication rate, and cost, and appears to be superior in terms of return of bowel function and hospital stay.(Arch Surg. 1995;130:874-879)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.