We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Simplified Inflow Control Using Stapling Devices for Major Hepatic Resection

Katsuhiko Yanaga, MD; Takashi Nishizaki, MD; Kazuharu Yamamoto, MD; Akinobu Taketomi, MD; Takashi Matsumata, MD; Kenji Takenaka, MD; Keizo Sugimachi, MD
Arch Surg. 1996;131(1):104-106. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430130106025.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


We describe the efficacy of a new technique for hepatic inflow division using stapling devices in major hepatic resections. We studied 28 consecutive patients who underwent major hepatic resection at a tertiary referral center by en masse inflow control of Glisson's pedicle in 1993 and 1994, of whom 10 underwent inflow control with stapling devices. Although stapling devices were used for larger tumors (mean±SD, 12.2±8.6 vs 5.7±5.0 cm; P=.02), the operation time (261±57 vs 301±143 minutes), operative blood loss (2071± 1318 vs 4792±6586 mL), postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding (0% [0/10] vs 17% [3/18]), and hospital stay (16.0±2.6 vs 20.6±7.4 days) were favorable for resections with staplers vs resections without staplers; the overall incidences of postoperative complications (40% [4/10] vs 39% [7/18]) and hospital death (10% [1/10] vs 6% [1/18]) were comparable in the two groups. We conclude that stapling devices allow simple, quick, and safe en masse inflow control in major hepatic resections.

(Arch Surg. 1996;131:104-106)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.