0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

Invited Commentary

Kazutomo Inoue, MD
Arch Surg. 1996;131(2):175. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430140065017.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

ABSTRACT

It is widely accepted that survival following gastrectomy for gastric cancer is superior for Japanese patients. Surgeons in Japan have demonstrated that curative resection with extensive lymphadenectomy leads to the high survival rate for gastric cancer, whereas some surgeons in the United States question if superior Japanese outcomes might be explained, in part, by racial factors. Hundahl and colleagues retrospectively compared the stage-stratified survival of gastrectomized Japanese patients in Honolulu treated for gastric cancer according to Western techniques with that of a cohort of Tokyo Japanese patients treated according to Japanese techniques, thus eliminating race as a potentially confounding variable. The authors proposed three hypotheses (the different-disease hypothesis, stage-migration hypothesis, and treatment hypothesis) explaining the better Japanese survival rates and concluded that these results cannot be explained by race-related factors or the different-disease hypothesis, but seem more likely to be explained by the lymphadenectomy-related stage migration and/or therapeutic efficacy.

In

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();