Safe Laparoendoscopic Approach to Biliary Pancreatitis in Older Patients

Michael F. McGrath, MD; Janette C. McGrath, MD; Joubin Gabbay; Edward H. Phillips, MD; Jonathan R. Hiatt, MD
Arch Surg. 1996;131(8):826-833. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430200036006.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective:  To evaluate management strategies for biliary pancreatitis in different age groups.

Design:  Retrospective review.

Setting:  Large private metropolitan teaching hospital.

Patients:  Patients seen between January 1991 and December 1994 with a diagnosis of biliary pancreatitis (N=136) divided into 2 groups (group 1, aged <65 years; group 2, aged ≥65 years).

Interventions:  Primary treatments included endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (n=36) alone or with endoscopic sphincterotomy (n=27); operative procedures, including cholecystectomy by laparoscopic (n=54) or open (n=16) approaches; or no definitive therapy (n=22). Secondary treatments of common bile duct stones included laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration (n=5), open common bile duct exploration (n=4), or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (n= 10).

Main Outcome Measures:  Success of interventions, incidence and treatment of common bile duct stones, morbidity and mortality rates, frequency of retained stones, and length of hospitalization.

Results:  Numbers of Ranson criteria were higher for older patients (group 1, 0.83±0.12 vs group 2, 1.57±0.11 [mean±SEM]; P<.001). Primary endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed earlier than operative procedures, with a significantly higher incidence of common bile duct stones (72% vs 19%; P<.001). Number of primary procedures and complication and mortality rates for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy were 36,8%, and 3%, respectively; for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 54, 9%, and 2%, respectively; and for open cholecystectomy, 16, 6%, and 19%, respectively. For complication and mortality rates, there were no statistical differences between groups or among treatments. Deferred therapy was used in 30 patients, with 20% readmitted for recurrence of biliary pancreatitis. Length of intensive care unit and total hospital stay were similar for all groups and treatments.

Conclusions:  Older patients with biliary pancreatitis may be safely treated with a combined laparoendoscopic approach. Management of common bile duct stones depends on age, with laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or open common bile duct exploration preferred for younger patients and laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for older ones. Deferred therapy has a substantial relapse rate.Arch Surg. 1996;131:826-833


Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.