We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

The Impact of Histopathology on Nodal Metastases in Minimal Breast Cancer

Isha A. Mustafa, MD; Bernard Cole, PhD; Harold J. Wanebo, MD; Kirby I. Bland, MD; Helena R. Chang, MD, PhD
Arch Surg. 1997;132(4):384-391. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430280058008.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Objective:  To establish a model based on risk factor analysis to guide selective axillary lymph node dissection in patients with T1a and T1b breast cancers.

Design:  Retrospective review to determine histopathologic features and patient demographic profiles that may influence the incidence of nodal metastases.

Setting:  Primary care and referral centers in Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

Patients:  Women with invasive breast cancers with nodal status reported to the statewide tumor registry, the Hospital Association of Rhode Island, and the tumor registry at Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Mass, between January 1984 and December 1995. There were 12 030 patients with breast cancer reported; 2185 (18%) of these had tumors 1 cm or less in diameter.

Interventions:  None.

Main Outcomes Measure:  Axillary node metastases.

Results:  The nodal status of 377 patients with T1a tumors and 1808 patients with Tib tumors was studied. Seventy-five percent had axillary dissections, and 16% were found to have nodal metastases. Thirty-one percent (29/93) of patients younger than 40 years had positive nodes compared with 15% (241/1546) of older patients (P=.001). The T1a tumors had fewer metastases than the Tib tumors did (11% vs 17%; P=.02). Nuclear grade was available in 49% of cases. Nuclear grades 2 and 3 were associated with nodal involvement twice as often as grade 1 tumors were (P=.002). Patients with no poor prognostic factors had a 7% or less chance of nodal involvement, while patients with all 3 poor prognostic indicators had a 33.5% chance of nodal involvement.

Conclusions:  Selective nodal dissection may be possible through risk factor analysis. Prospective registration of complete histopathologic information will allow more comprehensive analysis and may further enhance the selective treatment of patients with minimally invasive breast cancer.Arch Surg. 1997;132:384-391


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.