0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

Ischemic Necrotic Bowel Disease in Thermal Injury

Areta Kowal-Vern, MD; Victoria McGill, MHL; Richard L. Gamelli, MD
Arch Surg. 1997;132(4):440-443. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430280114020.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background:  Gastrointestinal tract (GI) complications are a well-recognized entity following burn injury.

Objectives:  To determine whether there was a change in the incidence and type of GI complications in individuals with thermal injuries requiring operative intervention and whether this might be related to changes in patient management.

Design:  A retrospective 8-year study of patients admitted with burn injuries.

Setting:  A university medical center burn unit.

Methods:  Statistical analysis and pathological review of 2 groups of patients: those with ischemic necrotic bowel disease (INBD group) and those with other GI complications (other GI complication group), identified among 2114 patients admitted with burn injuries during an 8-year period (1988-1995).

Results:  Of 2114 patients admitted with burn injuries, 19 patients were identified retrospectively as having had either INBD (n= 10) or other GI complications (n=9). Statistical analysis showed no difference between the 2 groups in duration of hospitalization, age, sex, pneumonia, mortality, peritonitis or gastric ulcer disease, inhalation injury, ventilator use, grafting procedures, or infections. The patients in the INBD group had a statistically significant mean (±SD) increase in the percentage of total burn surface area compared with those in the other GI complication group (53%± 10% vs 22%± 7%; P<.02) and sepsis prior to the GI complication (32% vs 5%; P<.03). A statistically significant decrease was noted in the incidence of paralytic ileus (17% vs 69%; P<.03). Enteral nutritional support became the primary mode of treatment, and GI hemorrhage and ulcer disease decreased during this period. Patients with total burn surface area greater than 40% and sepsis were at increased risk of INBD during their hospitalization.

Conclusions:  The severity of thermal injury and systemic infection are risk factors for the development of INBD. This entity is more frequent currently because of increased survival of the more severely injured patients. Systemic infection may alter the integrity of the bowel, which becomes less "tolerant" of enteral feedings. The role of large-volume high-density enteral feedings as a usually associated event in these patients remains speculative.Arch Surg. 1997;132:440-443

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();