We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Emergency Surgery for Colon Cancer in the Aged

Thomas Koperna, MD; Michael Kisser, MD; Franz Schulz, MD
Arch Surg. 1997;132(9):1032-1037. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430330098018.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Background:  The prognosis of colon cancer is poorest in cases of emergency presentation of this disease in the elderly. The high rate of clinical mortality in this group of patients has made it necessary to devise a specific therapeutic approach.

Objective:  To define the therapeutic approach used for colon cancer in the elderly.

Design:  A retrospective study.

Setting:  A secondary referral center.

Patients:  Ninety-nine patients with colon carcinoma that first became clinically manifested in an emergency situation were examined retrospectively. The patients had been treated from 1986 through 1995. All patients were older than 70 years. A total of 74 patients showed clinical manifestation of a colon carcinoma with an ileus, while 10 patients had tumor perforation. A further 15 patients had a perforation proximal to an obstructing tumor.

Main Outcome Measures:  Clinical lethality, surgical procedure, risk of comorbidity, and multiple organ system failure.

Results:  Any increase in comorbidity was associated with a higher clinical lethality, which was especially true for the lungs, heart, and kidney, and also for diabetes. In 44.4% of the patients with a significantly higher comorbidity (P=.04) and a more advanced tumor stage (P<.001), the tumor was left in situ during the primary surgical intervention. Patients who survived after staged resection had an even higher comorbidity at first presentation when compared with patients who survived after primary resection (P=.02). However, the comorbidity of deceased patients who were supposed to undergo staged resection did not differ significantly from the comorbidity of those who underwent primary resection (P=.70). The clinical lethality in patients who were managed by stoma only or by bypass anastomosis was markedly higher than that in patients who underwent primary resection (59.0% vs 43.6%). The significantly highest postoperative mortality rate was recorded in patients who underwent primary resection after colonic perforation (74%) (P=.03),while the significantly lowest postoperative mortality rate was recorded in patients who underwent primary resection after tumor obstruction (28%) (P<.001). Postoperative failure of the lungs and heart and kidney failure requiring hemodialysis were associated with significantly higher clinical mortality rates (P<.001 to P=.004). Postoperative complications occurred in 28 (28.3%) of the patients. However, rupture of the anastomosis was observed in only 2 of these patients. Generalized disease was associated with a significantly higher rate of postoperative complications (P=.04), which was especially true for pneumonia (P=.003). However, no effect on survival was found for patients with Dukes disease stage D.

Conclusions:  The lower mortality rate following primary resection is achieved by preselection of patients. The preselection is such that patients in poor general condition who have tumors in advanced stages are not treated by resection. The significantly (P=.03) highest postoperative mortality rate in patients who underwent primary resection after tumor perforation reflects the necessity of resection in those cases regardless of higher comorbidity. In an emergency situation, initial minimal surgery followed by staged resection is a feasible alternative to treat aged patients with a higher comorbidity and an intraoperatively established greater spread of tumor. This procedure permits delayed radical resection at the lowest rate of clinical mortality for this age group and is especially suitable for frail, aged patients in poor condition. The advantages of staged resection can be demonstrated by the fact that more patients with a higher comorbidity survive. The poor physiological adaptability of elderly patients limits their ability to compensate for postoperative organ failure and adds the risk of comorbidity. Hence, these 2 factors are associated with poor prognosis in this age group.Arch Surg. 1997;132:1032-1037


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.