0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Special Feature |

Image of the Month—Diagnosis FREE

Arch Surg. 2008;143(4):424. doi:10.1001/archsurg.143.4.424.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

The CT scan depicts an endoleak, which is persistent filling of contrast into the aneurysm sac after stent graft exclusion. They are classified into 5 types. Type I refers to a leak across the seal zone either proximally or distally. Type I leaks are usually seen at placement or years later after migration of the proximal attachment. If seen during initial placement, they should be treated prior to terminating the operation because they rarely spontaneously resolve.

Type II endoleaks are due to retrograde flow through branch vessels, which are either lumbar arteries or the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). They occur in approximately 20% of patients after endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.1 Type II endoleaks are typically followed with serial CT scans, and many are seen to close spontaneously. Some surgeons will treat if the endoleak persists for greater than 6 months, some will treat for growth in the aneurysm sac, and others require both. The treatment goal is to close the endoleak allowing complete exclusion of the aneurysm sac. Options for nonsurgical treatment include embolization using coils or fibrin glue by a transarterial or translumbar approach. Surgical options range from a laparoscopically placed clip to conversion to an open vascular repair.

Type III endoleaks are secondary to leakage between the modular components or between the main body and the docking limb of a stent graft. Like type I endoleaks, these either occur early or late. If detected at the time of the procedure, typically further angioplasty is needed to form a seal. If detected late, it is usually due to material fatigue and then fracture of the stent or suture breakdown. Late type III endoleaks require additional cuff or limb placement, sometimes requiring placement of an aortouniliac device within the original stent graft with a femoral-femoral crossover graft.

Type IV endoleaks are caused by graft porosity. Very frequently this is seen on completion arteriogram at the time of placement due to transgraft migration of contrast. Type IV endoleaks do not require therapy because they resolve when the heparinization from the operation is allowed to reverse.

Type V endoleak was originally used to describe an aneurysm sac that was growing in size secondary to endotension—or persistent systemic pressurization of the sac—but a discrete cause could not be found.

Our patient was found to have a type II endoleak from his IMA on his first postoperative CT scan. This was followed with serial CT scans. Two years after endograft placement, a repeat CT scan was performed, which showed a persistent type II endoleak with a slight increase in sac size (Figure, A).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.

Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (A) and superior mesenteric artery arteriogram (B).

Graphic Jump Location

The patient was then taken to the Interventional Radiology Suite where an abdominal aortogram was performed followed by selective catheterization of the superior mesenteric artery. The superior mesenteric artery arteriogram demonstrates a blush—contrast pooling in the midline aneurysm sac from retrograde filling of the IMA—which is by definition a type II endoleak (Figure, B). A microcatheter was then advanced through this collateral pathway to embolize the origin of the IMA using Tornado microcoils (Cook, Bloomington, Indiana), with follow-up arteriogram showing immediate technical success.

The initial technical success of transarterial embolization is 79% in patients where all sources can be accessed via collaterals.2 The question of whether pressure will still be transmitted across coils to increase endotension is currently not answered as long-term follow-up has not yet been reported.

Return to

Correspondence: Ravishankar Hasanadka, MD, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (hasanadka@gmail.com).

Accepted for Publication: December 4, 2006.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Hasanadka and Brown. Acquisition of data: Hasanadka. Analysis and interpretation of data: Hasanadka. Drafting of the manuscript: Hasanadka. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Brown. Administrative, technical, and material support: Hasanadka. Study supervision: Brown.

Steinmetz  ERubin  BGSanchez  LA  et al.  Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective. J Vasc Surg 2004;39 (2) 306- 313
PubMed Link to Article
Sheehan  MKBarbato  JCompton  CNZajko  ARhee  RMakaroun  MS Effectiveness of coiling in the treatment of endoleaks after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2004;40 (3) 430- 434
PubMed Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.

Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (A) and superior mesenteric artery arteriogram (B).

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Steinmetz  ERubin  BGSanchez  LA  et al.  Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective. J Vasc Surg 2004;39 (2) 306- 313
PubMed Link to Article
Sheehan  MKBarbato  JCompton  CNZajko  ARhee  RMakaroun  MS Effectiveness of coiling in the treatment of endoleaks after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2004;40 (3) 430- 434
PubMed Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections